archtorify VS pacstall

tor is good and all but it's actually not as secure as it might seem, whoever controls the exit node controls the traffic, if you're using arch linux you can use something like this to make sure your session is secure

One alternative would be to install a regular linux distro that supports rpi and have all network settings go through the Tor network, e.g. Arch using Archtorify. But that means data is stored on the machine and you lose the whole live OS aspect that you get with Tails. One way round this is to have the OS saved on the SD Card and you can just unplug it when not in use, so it's always in your pocket. Not exactly a live distro but at least it's always in your possession. You could probably encrypt it, too.

I use some package managers to install my programs in Kubuntu, apt which is the distro's default, pacstall and [brew](https:// brew.sh).

You might take a look at pacstall: https://github.com/pacstall/pacstall

Looks like it's not a rolling release. It's a stable ubuntu with unstable packages (from the pacstall repo)

Check out https://pacstall.dev/

If you use Pacstall, you can run pacstall -I nala-deb

Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists.