appimage-builder
GNU/Linux packaging solution using the AppImage format (by AppImageCrafters)
winepak
Flatpak-ing Microsoft Windows applications with Wine (by winepak)
| appimage-builder | winepak | |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | 5 | |
| 292 | 280 | |
| 3.4% | 0.7% | |
| 5.6 | 10.0 | |
| about 1 month ago | almost 6 years ago | |
| Python | ||
| MIT License | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
appimage-builder
Posts with mentions or reviews of appimage-builder.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-23.
-
Probono, creator of AppImage, in an attempt to get AppImage support, is banned from the OBS Studio organization on GitHub after downright rude comments and accuses them of supporting Flatpak because of the bounty offered by RH. "In any event, please do not bother our project anymore"
A tool that is capable of bundling everthing (including glibc, libstdc++. and gcc 9 runtime libraries) like https://github.com/AppImageCrafters/appimage-builder or go-appimage appimagetool -s deploy may be better suited for the meantime
- appimage-builder v1.0.1 is here
-
How to Develop Linux Applications (Part 2)
wget -O appimage-builder-x86_64.AppImage https://github.com/AppImageCrafters/appimage-builder/releases/download/v1.0.0-beta.1/appimage-builder-1.0.0-677acbd-x86_64.AppImage chmod +x appimage-builder-x86_64.AppImage # install (optional) sudo mv appimage-builder-x86_64.AppImage /usr/local/bin/appimage-builder
- appimage-builder 1.0.0 was released, a tool for packing applications along with all of its dependencies using the system package manager to obtain binaries and resolve dependencies.
- appimagebuilder v1.0.0-alpha1 is here
-
I have an application (written in python) which uses libadwaita. How would I create an AppImage that contains all required dependencies for this app?
AppImage Builder Can Be Configured To use Pacman Too. Look At This Example And Umm Yea LibAdwaita is Not Available in Most Repositories.
- Good news AppImage makers and Arch Linux users! Now it's possible to use the appimage-builder generator feature to create bundle recipes using pacman. This is feature comes with a great remake of the whole generator implementation. Give it a try
winepak
Posts with mentions or reviews of winepak.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-29.
- How do I go about packaging niche Windows games into dedicated flatpaks?
-
Wine 8.0-rc5 released
I don't know, both flatpak-wine and winepak seems to not be adopted en-masse.
-
Flatpak 1.15.0 is released, bringing support for League of Legends (and other games that require modify_ldt to be working) emulation through Wine inside the sandbox, among other things
Theoretically, you can do either a Winepak / winepak-x86_64 or a PrismLauncher/FFXIVLauncher/a-certain-game-launcher release of LoL to give it a Flatpak release.
-
Probono, creator of AppImage, in an attempt to get AppImage support, is banned from the OBS Studio organization on GitHub after downright rude comments and accuses them of supporting Flatpak because of the bounty offered by RH. "In any event, please do not bother our project anymore"
The reason being that there is literally no point to duplicating flathub just to have your own repo, why waste computing resources. If you want to host a special build of apps that aren't on flathub, then yeah, people are hosting their own remotes. See this one, this one and this one.
-
Flatpaking Apple Airport Utility
Ehm no, that is not correct. https://github.com/winepak/winepak
What are some alternatives?
When comparing appimage-builder and winepak you can also consider the following projects:
AppImageKit - Package desktop applications as AppImages that run on common Linux-based operating systems, such as RHEL, CentOS, openSUSE, SLED, Ubuntu, Fedora, debian and derivatives. Join #AppImage on irc.libera.chat
flatpaks
exodus - Painless relocation of Linux binaries–and all of their dependencies–without containers.
flatpak-wine-runtime - Experimental Flatpak Wine runtime
deezer-linux - An universal linux port of deezer, supporting Flatpak, Appimage, Snap, RPM, DEB...
xclicker - XClicker - Fast gui autoclicker for x11 linux desktops
Bottles - Run Windows software and games on Linux
AM2R-Autopatcher-Linux - Host repository for the AM2R Linux update data.
auto-cpufreq - Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux
Python-Pulseaudio-Loopback-Tool - A graphical tool to create basic loopbacks, virtual sinks, and to remap sources in Pulseaudio
snapstore - Obsolete super minimalist example "store" to serve snap packages
zap - :zap: Delightful AppImage package manager
appimage-builder vs AppImageKit
winepak vs flatpaks
appimage-builder vs exodus
winepak vs flatpak-wine-runtime
appimage-builder vs deezer-linux
winepak vs xclicker
appimage-builder vs Bottles
appimage-builder vs AM2R-Autopatcher-Linux
appimage-builder vs auto-cpufreq
appimage-builder vs Python-Pulseaudio-Loopback-Tool
appimage-builder vs snapstore
appimage-builder vs zap