actix VS sdk

9. Actix

I think it's fairer to say the language got so much more powerful that there wasn't any point making actors a language feature when they can be built from existing orthogonal language features. You're probably looking for actix (not actix-web, just actix). There's also Lunatic built in Rust but supporting any actors compiled to WebAssembly.

Actix is an actor framework for developing concurrent applications built on top of the Tokio asynchronous runtime. It allows multiple actors to run on a single thread, but also allows actors to run on multiple threads via Arbiters. Actors can communicate with each other by sequentially exchanging typed messages.

I’ve seen frameworks for c++ (https://seastar.io/) and rust (https://github.com/actix/actix) which support what you’re describing out of the box.

The actix repository on github doesn't seem to be very active, and everyone seems to be focused on actix-web instead, is anyone out there using plain actix or any other actor-model implementation in Rust?

Rust is also another possibility: it's basically C++ but more modern with added features and safety. It can be tricky to write mathematical stuff in it, because you may not care too much about all the safety concerns Rust forces you to handle, but it can be useful to catch bugs ahead of times. Sadly, Rust seems to have no library for running programs on clusters of PCs, except maybe this one, which takes the Actor model implemented by Actix and runs it on a cluster. I don't know how tricky it is to use the Actor model for a scientific simulation, tho.

I'd just use Actix for that. Make your state an actor and make it a StreamHandler for each of these sources, and that's it - now you just implement the business logic for handling each message in the StreamHandler::handle methods.

However, this isn't even 50% of what's out there: Need raw parallel power (and maybe don't need an async runtime)? Checkout Rayon. Need simple Actors for concurrent processing? Checkout Actix. Need a larger Actor system for fault tolerance/CQRS messaging? Checkout Riker. Damn, I sound like a youtube advert 🤦 - For real though, this is the tip of the concurrency iceberg. There is so much more - and it's growing.

50. Dart - $55,862

Gerrit is optimized for in-house work lead by engineers who would rather be using Subversion. ("Subversion merge isn't worth using so I don't see why we need it.") It tends to be hostile to community contribution: outsiders get a second-class experience, so if community participation is your goal it's a bad choice.

First off, Flutter uses Dart for its codebase. This means that the Dart programming language is used to develop the UIs, logic, and functionalities of applications and software built with Flutter.

The methods and other important information are documented in detail here. I have been exploring it and received some advice from Norbert 🙌.

Programming Language: Dart

Official Dart website: dart.dev Dart Language Tour: dart.dev/guides/language/language-tour Dart API Reference: api.dart.dev

Flutter is written in Dart, and its C interop story isn't strong (all functions that have to be callable from C have to be specifically annotated, and it doesn't support named parameters, which are used all over the place in Flutter). Here is my ticket for that.