YAPO-e-plus
YAPO e+ - Yet Another Porn Organizer (extended) (by cooperdk)
gitlab
By gitlab-org
| YAPO-e-plus | gitlab | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 448 | |
| 138 | - | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | - | |
| over 1 year ago | - | |
| Python | ||
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
YAPO-e-plus
Posts with mentions or reviews of YAPO-e-plus.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-20.
gitlab
Posts with mentions or reviews of gitlab.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-22.
-
Gitlab Duo
Since the relevant code appears to be in the "ee" directory <https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v16.11.0-ee/ee/l...> and is not present in the foss repo, I'm guessing the answer is no, at least for now. They do have a history of "releasing" features from EE back to CE but my suspicion is not for LLM stuff
- Code Search Is Hard
- XZ Backdoor Investigation Request to Gitlab Team
-
Client side Git hooks 101
(Side note: Issues are usually hash-prefixed like #1234 both on GitLab and GitHub. However, commit messages must not begin with a hash, they would be considered a comment and ignored. Therefore, GitHub has introduced the alternative prefix GH- and I've contributed a similar prefix GL- to GitLab a while ago.)
- Assign Issue to an AI Developer
-
BuildKit in depth: Docker's build engine explained
and its "oh, you want multi-arch, do you?" friend. While prosecuting this <https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/339567> I learned that https://hub.docker.com/layers/multiarch/qemu-user-static/7.2... actually mutates the binfmt_misc in buildx's context in order to exec the static copy of qemu in it https://github.com/multiarch/qemu-user-static/blob/v7.2.0-1/...
and, that the buildx plugin itself has some qemu magick in it, which got addressed in a minor version bump but I couldn't track down the relevant GitHub issue this second (I've flushed it from my mind, only recalling that there were a lot of actors in that tire fire)
-
Gitlab password reset bug leaves more than 5.3K servers up for grabs
This is actually a follow-up refactor, the fix is here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/commit/abe79e4ec43798...
- ExifTool CVE-2021-22204 – Arbitrary Code Execution
- Critical Gitlab vulnerability exposes 2FA-less users to account takeovers
- Upcoming critical Gitlab security issue