standards-positions VS web.dev

You can check why Mozilla and Apple have opted to not support this.

https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/154

https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/28

Neither Mozilla or Webkit are satisfied that the proposal is safe by default, and contains footguns for the user that can be pretty destructive.

Nope, was marked as WONTFIX: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182671

There was some more discussion in the webkit standards but looks like the answer is still unchanged: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/97

The new scrollbar styling properties are actually pretty consistent with native platforms. There's not that much flexibility with them - e.g. you can't define width in pixels, you just chose between thick, thin, or none, which match the existing native controls:

https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/133#iss...

> To add more information to this issue. This property supports three values, auto, thin and none. These match nicely to WebKit's ScrollbarControlSize::Regular and ScrollbarControlSize::Thin and not rendering the scrollbar.

Apple puts their policy positions on GitHub too. It's just where this is done for some reason: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions

Not yet but one day: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/18#issu...

Worth also noting is WebKit's standards positions at

https://webkit.org/standards-positions/

(this one has not landed yet, likely to be opposed as well)

Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very good introduction to rendering on the web that can help you understand rendering options.

The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev

Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css

I noticed the same for Google's site https://web.dev/

The last article pushed to the feed was "Changes to the web.dev infrastructure" few months ago https://web.dev/blog/webdev-migration

The feed still there but with no updates https://web.dev/feed.xml and on the site you can see new articles published.

Is sad that on a infrastructure revamp of a modern site, the RSS feed was left out of the features list (at least for now).

Upon testing on Firefox and Mi Browser, there was no triggering of the BeforeInstallPrompt event, as expected. However, I noticed that web.dev manages to display a prompt on these browsers, even though they theoretically lack support for the BeforeInstallPrompt event.

web.dev, maintained by Google, including posts by Chrome developers and their co-workers,

In a old web.dev articleI came across the word "Incremental (Re)Hydration" which is linked to a Glimmer.js-Blog post (also called "Incremental Rendering" there) confuses me. Is Incremental (Re)Hydration the same as Progressive (Re)Hydration? Reading the Glimmer-Blog article it seems so, but in the web.devarticle it seems to be something different.

Web.dev newsletter - though it's not a weekly newsletter and it's only content from web.dev (though really high quality content)

Just open up a text edi web developers are self-taught. a website. That's what I did. Some people like this: https://web.dev