QGIS VS brave-core

Prepare GIS data for use with Amazon Athena. This time, we created four types of sample data in QGIS in advance.

I am using Qgis to try to edit the map database and add polygon territories for any future changes to the GeoJSON that I created/edited.

Judging by this open issue in the QGIS repo it doesn't seem to be possible to skip fully transparent tiles.

In the most generic, high level way: grab the source code, start up a debugging session with a profiler, and see what/where the bottleneck is. Bonus points for documenting the issue and submitting a bug report. Extra double bonus points for opening a pull request to

Access: QGIS

Hi! I used QGIS to create the map and BRouter to create the lines as routes. Does help that GIS is one of the major parts of my profession so I'm fairly familiar with designing maps

qgis Desktop software.

Oh hm i may have misunderstood this answer: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/36683

Adding natural breaks to symbology for rasters is an open feature request (since 2020) https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/39746

Unrelated but about Brave and interesting to me: I recently found myself having a large upstream project that I need to maintain some custom patches for, and there's a need for deeper customizations and I worry that my rudimentary system of applying .patch files will turn into an unmaintainable nightmare of merge conflicts after every rebase. I was thinking about possible solutions, and it occurred to me that Brave being Chromium-based must have this same challenge but an order of magnitude more difficult, so I looked for their code to see how they solved this issue.

It's pretty interesting! They do basically the same thing for core Chromium, applying a (big) set of patches[1].

Incidentally, I'd be interested to hear any ideas/approaches to this problem. I'm guessing if there was something clearly better, Brave would be doing it, but it seems like there should be a better way even if I can't think of one.

[1] https://github.com/brave/brave-core/tree/master/patches

https://github.com/brave/brave-core/pull/13737

(Incidentally, that PR number is not quite elite. :)

I disagree that it's lip service Brave has a ton of engine level privacy patches https://github.com/brave/brave-core/tree/master/patches

To my understanding you can't match it with just js extensions.

Only firefox on the highest security mode comes close I think?

Or ungoogled chromium? (brave has most of their patches IIRC)

Are there other options that have this number of patches?

Chromium is not 100% Google's forever and always, though they do currently lead the way, and with the most used/backed fork.

https://github.com/brave/brave-core/pull/19476

They have much more changes than just compile flags. Here's the repo where they maintain their patch set: https://github.com/brave/brave-core/tree/master/patches

Brave Private Ads toggle controls just Push Notification ads at this time. So, if you are still seeing Push Notification ads, that would be incorrect. However, it's normal to still see New Tab Page image ads, and/or other ad formats. We are introducing a new UI that helps you better toggle on/off specific ad units, and removing the "Brave Private Ads" toggle that can be confusing: https://github.com/brave/brave-core/pull/18938

Yes, being fixed. Github at https://github.com/brave/brave-core/pull/18922