Nault VS P2PoW

Nano wallet : Natrium (App Store/Google Play) Or Nault (Web wallet) Remember to store your seed in a safe place

Recently merged Nault patch should fix infinite loading of account balances and the bug where 20 accounts were added on recovery seed/mnemonic import or ledger device import, regardless if they have been used in the past. Both of these issues appeared due to breaking RPC changes in Node versions V24.0 and V25.0. Desktop version currently does not have those fixes as it fails to build due to a compatibility issue with a bluetooth-related dependency.

If you import your seed to https://nault.cc/ it will immediately send/receive any pending transactions.

- I say "codebase" in the title because I'm intentionally not a maintainer nor nault dot cc domain owner, and have no control if and when it gets merged (could be years). The pull request is available at https://github.com/Nault/Nault/pull/587 and is open source. You are free to use it however you like as long as it adheres to the code license.

Yeah a lot of people have a ledger. Best way is to properly use https://nault.cc/ and configure for ledger

https://nault.cc is the best for web / desktop

Export your seed from Trust wallet and import it into Nault at https://nault.cc/ - you will then see the nano being received into your account.

fix BigNumber usage with undefined - assume 0 in that case. #573 fixes infinite balance loading when one of the wallet accounts was never used

Go to https://nault.cc/ and import it there.

Interestingly, there are even cryptocurrencies out there that claim to be "fee-less", such as Nano (XNO), however with respect to some of these, you may need to use a 3rd party wallet to manage them with your Ledger device - as is the specific case with Nano (you'll want to use a Ledger compatible 3rd party wallet, such as Nault).

I am learning about nano, and I am a big fan so far. I am trying to wrap my mind around distributed proof of work (DPoW) and similar projects (e.g. P2PoW) and whether they have potential to violate Nano's core principle of being energy efficient (and feeless). I think for this to really be a concern, these services would need to be abused by spam attacks (like the current attack)

That said, PoW doesn't have to be subsidized by third parties forever. Wallets could introduce various kinds of fees to cover their expenses with calculating the PoW on their own servers, for instance. Then you have systems like https://github.com/anarkrypto/P2PoW that seems to incentivize PoW providers more directly (I haven't explored it much yet).