NSudo VS Duplicati

Before you update you could try starting Task Manager with NSudo under the SYSTEM account. Might bypass that access is denied error.

NSudo is Open Source

That file is NSudo, an open source sudo-like tool for Windows. If GenP were malicious, it would most likely be the other files, not NSudo.

And I have that batch file in the same folder as NSudoLC.exe when extracted from the latest NSudo release from https://github.com/M2Team/NSudo/releases This should also work fine on 10.

i looked up the code a bit and it actually disables the defender.. the only red flag here IMO is it disables a lot of protection like network firewalls too, so now you won't get any alert for threats and intrusions, and it downloads(see this and this ) a tool your local machine though, but it is an opensource tool which is used to access high privileged files commonly used by developers to test and debug.. other than that it doesn't send any info from your machine to any external servers.

NSudo - A Powerful System Administration Tool.

You could always manually re-create the service referencing a clean windows 10 image (services.msc). I should probably note that this service is generally owned by Trusted Installer and should be re-created with the same privileges to avoid any conflicts (or security holes). Worse case scenario run Services.msc with NSUDO https://github.com/M2Team/NSudo

Petabaytlarca veri emanet edilen şu kodun %85'i C# https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati

For my parents' computer, I'm using the canary version (which should be the alpha version I think?) of Duplicati since years.

It hasn't had a release in a little while but work is still occurring. https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/actions.

Hey have a read at : https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/issues/4041

I just came across this while looking through their issues to see if anyone else had reported the firefox issue i'm running into. I'm starting to have serious reservations.

I like duplicacy because of the way it keeps the chunks in the file system, without a special database. This makes it scale up really well no matter how many backups you have (you can even have multiple computers saved). It's kind of beyond weird how you select what you want to backup with the symlinks (using the command line version), looks more like what one would make for himself in a weekend (not that I'm complaining about free software!) but it's been without bugs for me and extremely efficient. In contrast duplicati has a perfect interface, it's well maintained and everything but bogs down in any large backup, has stories about people recovering for weeks for a very few local TBs and I've experienced for myself this, granted in the python that is checking the sha256 checksums of the backups but it makes it slower many times (possibly hundreds of times), nobody checked from 2013 to 2021 (or did it on tiny datasets like 1GB or was content to wait for weeks even on something small-ish)?