ModSecurity VS coreruleset

Coraza and ModSecurity have a high detection rate, but they are not adapted to reality scenarios, resulting in too many false positives.

Official GitHub: ModSecurity Stars: 8K

SafeLine vs ModSecurity

cd /opt && sudo git clone https://github.com/owasp-modsecurity/ModSecurity.git cd ModSecurity sudo git submodule init sudo git submodule update sudo ./build.sh sudo ./configure sudo make sudo make install

First of all, if you have any experience with Traefik, I'd suggest you to do the reverse proxy stuff with it and install the Crowdsec instance along it. As I didn't have experience using Traefik I went with NPM but now I guess it would have been easier considering the research I had to do... Another reason is, I wanted to implement a geo block and/or another security layer by using ModSecurity (https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity ) besides Crowdsec too. Afaik Traefik has a plugin that integrates ModSecurity easily - unless NPM.

I don't know about Blackboard, but Moodle will allow quizzes to be run in popups that block most extensions from working; lockdown browsers will block such extensions; and, if you have access to the server, a modified firewall (e.g., ModSecurity) may\* allow blocking this and similar extensions.

> ModSecurity for WAF: https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity

This might be of interest to some: https://www.modsecurity.org/

> Trustwave is announcing the End-of-Life (EOL) of our support for ModSecurity effective July 1, 2024. We will then hand over the maintenance of ModSecurity code back to the open-source community.

Probably not too big of a deal, though.

Also, this might be useful: https://owasp.org/www-project-modsecurity-core-rule-set/

Though there has been some critique of ModSecurity and that ruleset in the past, as something dated and with false positives.

Anyone have any good alternatives?

Is there a reason no one hasn't made a Docker template for OWASP Coraza (https://github.com/corazawaf/coraza) or ModSecurity (https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity) for the use of a reverse proxy?

sudo git clone https://github.com/coreruleset/coreruleset.git /etc/nginx/owasp-crs

--OWASP® ModSecurity Core Rule Set website

The other thing that came to my mind is the OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (https://coreruleset.org/), which seems somewhat analogous to your proposal. If so, it might be worth chatting with some of the CRS maintainers about what their journey was.

I would say it depends on your version. The core rule set git repo shows REQUEST-903.9002-WORDPRESS-EXCLUSION-RULES.conf being in versions 3.0.2 through 3.3.4.

If your focus is on generic detection rules than a good resource to start with is the OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (CRS) - However, this rule set is built for the mod_security WAF but depending on what data you get in from your customers, you might be able to forward it against your own mod_security instance and process the mod_security audit logs in Splunk without having to re-write/convert the rules.

I'm always getting great and helpful support from the CRS issue tracker: https://github.com/coreruleset/coreruleset/issues

Host-based firewalls and network firewalls won't always quite "cut it", OWASP ModSecurity is an open-source rule set for critical web applications that require an additional level of security.

Other than that we rely on quite a lot of things these days, notably ModSecurity and the OWASP Core Rule Set alongside some other heavy restricting of our apps. (the idea being that the app is safe on its own, but those act as extra layers of defense in case we fuck up something really badly in the app one day)

sudo git clone https://github.com/coreruleset/coreruleset /usr/share/modsecurity-crs