LiveCharts2 VS webrender

But I think some of this stuff is already handled in Avalonia ecosystem like https://github.com/Mapsui/Mapsui, https://github.com/beto-rodriguez/LiveCharts2 and few others...

As far as Uno Platform goes, one can use components from WinUI and Windows Community Toolkit (WCT); so you have hundreds of UI components to work with out of the box, including some must-haves like Data Grid in WCT. Some bigger component vendors have put out their betas i.e. https://www.infragistics.com/products/uno-platform or https://www.syncfusion.com/blogs/post/syncfusions-first-control-for-uno-platform-charts.aspx . I do agree this 3rd party ecosystem eventually needs to get more love from bigger vendors, or other new ones will also step in - i.e. Live Charts has support for Uno Platform https://github.com/beto-rodriguez/LiveCharts2 or MapsUI https://mapsui.com/documentation/getting-started-uno.html

It is beta now, but should be ready for production soon, The library will also provide multiple ready-to-go themes and a high-performance package.

LiveCharts2 is a charting library completely written in C# and it is a full rewrite of LiveCharts, now LiveCahrts can run everywhere MAUI, Uno Platform, Avalonia, Xamarin, WPF, WinForms, WinUI, console and on the server side.

Apex charts will definitely do the job This is one alternative I found while digging yesterday: https://github.com/beto-rodriguez/LiveCharts2

Live charts is a cross platforms charting library .Net, to get started go to https://lvcharts.com and take a look at the instalation guide of your target platform the web site contains all the samples provided in this repo, docs and more.

try version 2! https://github.com/beto-rodriguez/LiveCharts2

This source code:

https://github.com/servo/webrender/blob/master/wr_glyph_rast...

suggests to me that the glyph rasterization (which is the CPU-limiting factor for text rendering) in WebRender (which is the new FF 93+ GPU-accelerated rendering engine) is implemented in Rust and to be run on CPU.

Both Servo and Fifefox make use of webrender, which is an awesome piece of tech and is well suited to render a web page. Some GUI projects attempted to use webrender directly as well, like Azul and moxie-native

Surprised noone mentioned https://github.com/servo/webrender

Firefox article outlining which parts use Rust https://wiki.mozilla.org/Oxidation#Within_Firefox Servo/WebRender, the 2d renderer used by firefox: https://github.com/servo/webrender

Hi, what do you think about using webrender instead of wry on desktop? That is, instead of a full featured browser, just the bare minimum to render the DOM.

This is in the context of rust.

> it adds a line to a `go.sum` while with a hash of the code at the version specified

Cargo.lock also contains a checksum

> You can distribute your code without a copy of the dependency

Also true in rust, and the default way of using rust.

> If the hashes are different, an error is thrown.

Also true in rust.

For an example of what this looks like: https://github.com/servo/webrender/blob/54b725be37f13b166946...

You haven't described anything different between go and rust in your comment since every feature you've pointed out applies equally to both.

Yes! This is because web browsers use the platform text input stack

Browsers are a great example of cross-platform UI, because they sprinkle platform-native widgets throughout the canvas that they render. Which reminds me that people were trying to use webrender[1] to build native apps in Rust.

[1] https://github.com/servo/webrender

What more can be done, besides site isolation and ASLR+DEP? Oh wait, Mozilla rewrote the damn renderer in a better language than C(++), that seems like a good way to prevent issues.