LeanCopilot VS set.mm

Compare LeanCopilot vs set.mm and see what are their differences.

set.mm

Metamath source file for logic and set theory (by metamath)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
LeanCopilot set.mm
5 2
814 232
21.3% 1.7%
9.7 9.9
5 days ago 5 days ago
C++ HTML
MIT License Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

LeanCopilot

Posts with mentions or reviews of LeanCopilot. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-23.

set.mm

Posts with mentions or reviews of set.mm. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-23.
  • New Foundations is consistent – a difficult mathematical proof proved using Lean
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Apr 2024
    Correct. The good news that Elements still works otherwise, you just need to add the missing axiom.

    But many other "proofs" have been found to be false. The book "Metamath: A Computer Language for Mathematical Proofs" (by Norm Megill and yours truly) is available at: https://us.metamath.org/downloads/metamath.pdf - see section 1.2.2, "Trusting the Mathematician". We list just a few of the many examples of proofs that weren't.

    Sure, there can be bugs in programs, but there are ways to counter such bugs that give FAR more confidence than can be afforded to humans. Lean's approach is to have a small kernel, and then review the kernel. Metamath is even more serious; the Metamath approach is to have an extremely small language, and then re-implement it many times (so that a bug is unlikely to be reproduced in all implementations). The most popular Metamath database is "set.mm", which uses classical logical logic and ZFC. Every change is verified by 5 different verifiers in 5 different programming languages originally developed by 5 different people:

    * metamath.exe aka Cmetamath (the original C verifier by Norman Megill)

    * checkmm (a C++ verifier by Eric Schmidt)

    * smetamath-rs (smm3) (a Rust verifier by Stefan O'Rear)

    * mmj2 (a Java verifier by Mel L. O'Cat and Mario Carneiro)

    * mmverify.py (a Python verifier by Raph Levien)

    For more on these verifiers, see: https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/blob/develop/verifiers.md

  • Formalizing 100 Theorems
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Nov 2023

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LeanCopilot and set.mm you can also consider the following projects:

openpose - OpenPose: Real-time multi-person keypoint detection library for body, face, hands, and foot estimation

LeanDojoChatGPT - ChatGPT plugin for theorem proving in Lean

distributed-llama - Run LLMs on weak devices or make powerful devices even more powerful by distributing the workload and dividing the RAM usage.