tail VS ntp-parser

I'm working on a side-quest, and I just started using unit tests (hurray!): https://github.com/LeCyberDucky/tail/blob/main/src/main.rs

Since the program takes over the terminal when running, my trusty old debugging method of adding print statements everywhere doesn't work all too well here. Therefore, I took on the side quest of creating my own version of the UNIX tool "tail" this weekend. I'll write my debugging statements to a file instead and then use this tool to monitor that file. There are ways to achieve this without writing my own tool, but I wasn't completely satisfied with the stuff I tried (I'm on Windows), so I thought it would be fun and hopefully be too big a detour to implement it myself.

I've been using those today in this small project: https://github.com/LeCyberDucky/tail/blob/main/src/main.rs

Well nom does list out examples on the readme page, though many are probably for older versions of nom. I clicked through a couple and it looks like ntp is up to date with nom 6.0. The last full parser I wrote using nom was in v4.0 days, which was more macro-oriented than current nom. Since what you pass nom is slices of data, you will basically be reading from a file into a buffer, and calling your parsing functions on that. If it returns an error indicating it is incomplete, just read in another chunk of data into your buffer and try again.