LaZagne VS tmux

I tried to use https://github.com/AlessandroZ/LaZagne but it only tried a dictionary of 500 passwords + tries to bruteforce 3 lenght passwords.

You can use Lazagne to get the passwords saved in browsers - https://github.com/AlessandroZ/LaZagne

temp_dire = tempfile.gettempdir() os.chdir(temp_dire) download("https://github.com/AlessandroZ/LaZagne/releases/download/2.4.3/lazagne.exe")

It will basically do a search of the entire device, and in the case of computers (Windows at least) they will run benign malware on your system to retrieve passwords. This isn't fool proof and it will likely miss anything that wasn't saved in your browser (not including password managers thankfully). It will use keywords for fraud, child exploitation material, terrorism etc and where there is a match it will copy the file and save it for further analysis (if need be). Basically while the scan is happening and when its finished they will see a massive summary of thumbnails of every image and video you have for the analyst to then double check if anything bypassed the filter. It will also, based on keywords, show other files like documents that made a match. Note that the filter is also based on hash values as well as file names, but given the broad nature of keywords it will likely grab a lot of useless files - if you have the movie 'Baby Driver' on your computer, it will copy it and flag it as child exploitation material for example. I guess this shotgun approach is better than nothing.

If you logged in in your pc once it might still be on there somewhere, try using LaZagne (https://github.com/AlessandroZ/LaZagne)

This got me thinking about my recent pivot, my switch to Neovim by way of LazyVim to write most of my code, and using tmux to keep terminal states alive after closing a session.

I use Tmux. It's a terminal-agnostic multiplexer. Gives you persistence and automation superpowers.

https://github.com/tmux/tmux/wiki

Having a common set of tools already set up in different windows or sessions in Tmux or Zellij is obviously an option, but there is a subset of us ( 👋 ) that would rather just have fingertip access to our common tools inside of our editor.

Once you have your Mac or Linux machine ready, make sure to downlaod and install TMUX (Terminal Mulitplexer). A lot of our scripts are going to be running headless inside of a TMUX session as it's an incredibly clean way to manage and organise different workspaces simultaneously. A lot of our scripts will help us to interact with TMUX so don't worry if it looks a little intimidating at first. You can install TMUX using your package manager in the terminal, use whichever applies to you:

After having spent too much time trying to get the simple https://github.com/csdvrx/sixel-tmux/ features into mainline tmux (last November https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/3753), maybe it'd be easier to jump ship as use zellij?

Could anyone offer recommendations on "riced" zellij configuations, or just a demo where it shows doing with (say charts of disk usage per folder), watching a movie with mpv + keeping a vim to type on?

Well, I now use tmux and tmuxinator. I have had many failed tmux attempts over the years, but I'm firmly bedded in now.

Which leads me to clipboards. Linux has two of them! Adding to the interest, I typically use Neovim remotely, via an SSH connection to a Tmux session. And on my Linux system, I use urxvt as my terminal program. All of these are very UNIX-y tools, and somehow they all need to play nicely together.

The downside of overmind is that it requires tmux, which is a terminal multiplexer tool. If you don't already use tmux, I'd say it's probably not worth learning it just for the purposes of using overmind. But if you're like me and already know/use tmux, this can be a great solution to pursue.