InvenTree VS budibase

Sorry for the confusion if you thought this was a rust project; here is the explanation I added to the text:

InvenTree is an Open Source (MIT), self-hosted inventory and part library management system written mainly in Python. It uses Django and DRF to expose a REST API that can be used from the web, iOS and Android apps, a Python library and IOT devices.

Source code: https://github.com/inventree/inventree

If you have questions, search here for old questions and answers -> https://github.com/inventree/InvenTree/discussions

The exact same error text appears in multiple recent issues like this one: https://github.com/inventree/InvenTree/issues/5773, it is (probably) related to the minimum requirement of Python 3.9. Ubuntu 20.04 ships with 3.8 while the current LTS 22.04 includes 3.10.

If you like the IT method of asset management, then Snipe-IT is what you want. If you want something more inventory-y and parts-y, then check out PartKeepr or Inventree.

PLM tool written in Django/python: https://github.com/inventree/InvenTree/

This one is huge - 175 PRs huge. We have an extensive blog post out too. My personal highlights:

The team is pretty small, we are working on other parts of the platform at the moment; If you want to take a stab at it, here is the relevant issue: https://github.com/inventree/InvenTree/issues/3101

Depending on how public you want to be about your migration/company either open up an issue or discussion on our GitHub or contact me at code < AT > mjmair com - I have some ideas how this could work and would be willing to help with a script to get this going.

You can search by either one, multiparameter search is an open feature request.

Budibase is great at generating CRUD apps based on a model.

https://budibase.com/

Congratulations to the Airplane team.

Is this Airtable moving in the direction of low-code rather than no code? Puts them up against tools like Budibase [https://github.com/Budibase/budibase] and Retool [Https://retool.com]

I skipped to chapter 9 in the article ("Clogged"), and it looked like Pipes failed because it didn't have a large enough team or a well-defined mission. As a result they couldn't offer a super robust product that would lure in enterprise users. "You could not purchase some number of guaranteed-to-work Pipes calls per month" is the quote from the article.

The reason I think that interesting is because that's the model these days for everything from AI tokens to Monday.com seats. It makes me feel like Pipes was before its time.

That said I've been collecting different "business glue" products that are similar to Pipes. To me, like you say, they aren't as interesting, exciting and intuitive as Pipes was, but maybe it just takes a little more digging. I tried to focus on open source tools but some aren't.

- n8n io: https://n8n.io/integrations/mondaycom/

- Node-RED: https://nodered.org/ (just read about this one in this thread)

- trigger dev: trigger.dev

- automatisch.io: https://automatisch.io/docs/

- Activepieces: https://www.activepieces.com/docs/getting-started/introducti...

- Huginn: https://github.com/huginn/huginn

- budibase: https://budibase.com/

- windmill: https://www.windmill.dev/

- tooljet: https://www.tooljet.com/workflows

- Bracket: https://www.usebracket.com/pricing (just SalesForce <-> PostgreSQL)

- Zapier: zapier.com/

Anyway I hope some of these are fun!

Budibase is open-source, including the workflow platform which has helped accelerate thousands of workflows already:

https://github.com/Budibase/budibase

(4) Budibase | Build internal tools in minutes, the easy way. https://budibase.com/.

Also missing these app builders, both of which are open source but offer managed hosting:

* Budibase https://budibase.com

Buildbase