Hazel VS marley

I used a workflow template for MSBuild-based projects. When doing this lab exercise I referred to this video by TheCherno, who used the same template for his Hazel Game Engine developed using Visual Studio. The Microsoft Build Engine, MSBuild, is what Visual Studio uses to load and build managed projects. Since I'm also developing my project using Visual Studio, this template seemed like the best option.

Don't write a full blown abstraction, you won't use it. Also Hazel is a great game engine which relies on Vulkan that you could use as well.

And sometimes I feel like 50% of those are copy-pasted from Hazel, which is also far from being commercially viable, despite its popularity.

They're coming from the precompiled header in that project: https://github.com/TheCherno/Hazel/blob/dcdbfe13ac1d06a1650f66719cb4f79ecf310c85/Hazel/src/hzpch.h

https://github.com/TheCherno/Hazel there's a youtube series following the development of this engine, and other useful series on the same channel

Also, I just created premake configurations for the Vulkan SDK. Actually, this is only for the shader compiler and spirv-cross, so there might be more stuff from the SDK to be added.

IIRC, all those engines provide an ECS that could be compared to entt.

Also, there is Hazel[0] which is based on entt and is the subject of an amazing youtube series[1].

IMHO, tinier means less features, at that point what could be considered comparable?

  [0] - https://github.com/TheCherno/Hazel

There is an earlier iteration of the project with five emulator cores available (demo video). In this version, control was entirely handed over to the emulators when they were launched. It can be found here: Marley

Hey, The Marley team is looking for people to help out. I'd love to teach you C/C++. https://github.com/beaumanvienna/marley#readme