Gittyup VS ImageMagick

As to which git client to use, I highly recommend Tower -- if you want a free option then Gittyup is pretty good.

nope, they are just stating fork is good. Which honestly, fork doesn't seem that great. https://github.com/Murmele/Gittyup is what I recommend if you want to support open source. Gitkraken if you don't mind paying and have the patience to deal with electron.

I can't imagine using a paid, closed-source git client when https://github.com/desktop/desktop and https://github.com/Murmele/Gittyup are both great.

Maybe 10 years ago, but not now that open-source alternatives are so mature and feature-rich.

I've tried installing my favourite git client Gittyup with flatpak as the dev recommends here: https://github.com/Murmele/Gittyup

Interesting spreadsheet!

For a Git GUI for Linux (and Windows), you might like GitAhead which builds under Linux? It's not under active development but has been forked to GittyUp: https://github.com/Murmele/Gittyup

To tie all this together, we made an org profile for our GitHub organization page. There are some great examples of these, like Microsoft and PayPal. For Fastly's, we wanted something friendly and human so we used Imagemagick to create a montage of all the avatars of the Fastly team members who have contributed to the open source projects in our org:

Python has become a popular programming language for different applications, including data science, artificial intelligence, and web development. But, did you know creating and rendering fully customized videos with Python is also possible? At Stack Builders, we have successfully used Python libraries such as MoviePy, SciPy, and ImageMagick to generate videos with animations, text, and images. In this article, we will look closer at how Python can be used for video generation and explore some of the powerful libraries and tools that make it possible.

ImageMagick is the main tool and can do most conversions and image operations. For example to resize a whole folder of photos and convert to WebP you can do this:

Lack of open governance explains the fork in 2002. [0] The github commit history shows it's still a largely one-person-band. [1] The problems with this include a lack of succession planning, a lack of ability to scale bandwidth, and a narrower pool of ideas. The documentation website is really out-of-date as it mentions using a Borland compiler.

Alternatives to IM:

- https://www.libvips.org

- http://www.graphicsmagick.org (IM fork)

0. https://marc.info/?l=imagemagick-developer&m=104777007831767...

1. https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick

You can rotate it using https://imagemagick.org