Empirical_Study_of_Ensemble_Learning_Methods VS mljar-supervised

I've actually made the same kind of graph before. In this image: each point is the average of 5 out-of-fold predictions for one trial of k-fold cross-validation. I repeated the procedure 40 times to visualize the out-of-fold accuracy on the Wisconsin diagnostic breast cancer data set (560 observations on 30 numeric variables). I evaluated 14 models for classification:

Web App is using two open-source packages that I've created:

- MLJAR AutoML - Python package for AutoML on tabular data https://github.com/mljar/mljar-supervised

- Mercury - framework for converting Jupyter Notebooks into Web App https://github.com/mljar/mercury

You can run Web App locally. What is more, you can adjust notebook's code for your needs. For example, you can set different validation strategies or evalutaion metrics or longer training times. The notebooks in the repo are good starting point for you to develop more advanced apps.

It's an Automated Machine Learning python package. It's open-source, you can see how it works on GitHub: https://github.com/mljar/mljar-supervised

Sure, at the bottom of our website you can subscribe for newsletter.

If you need a simple and fast solution, go with auto-sklearn Maybe a bit more complex, but very powerful was mljar-supervised

In my case, I had experience in DS and software engineering. It gives me ability to start a company that works on Data Science tools.

MLJAR AutoML is a Python package for Automated Machine Learning on tabular data with feature engineering, explanations, and automatic documentation.

I recommend trying my AutoML package. You can easily check many different algorithms. Waht is more, the baseline algorithms are checked (major class predictor for classification and mean predictor for regression). The advance of AutoML is that it is really quick. You dont need to write preprocessing code, just call fit method.