Django-Styleguide VS pants

There are alternatives, such as HackSoft's Django style guide, but fat models, thin views is usually good enough.

I think this is a great resource. The only comment I have is on the Thin Views chapter. Instead of attaching logic to the models, I like to make a services.py file in my app that has functions that satisfy all sorts of business logic.

Here's another opinionated Django guide: https://github.com/HackSoftware/Django-Styleguide if anyone's interested

you can follow the Django Style Guide by Hacksoft. They have awesome style guide for you on github https://github.com/HackSoftware/Django-Styleguide

I would also recommend taking a look at HackSoftware's django styleguide repo. I found applicable. You don't have to follow it religiously (or at all) but still brings up some good food for thought.

I've read from Django Styleguide, Two Scoops of Django, Django for Startups, Still No Service, and a few threads even here in this subreddit (they largely reference above).

Perhaps the Django style guide is suitable? It definitely isn't a basic tutorial but perhaps it's too advanced? https://github.com/HackSoftware/Django-Styleguide

well Django encourages you to tightly couple your django code with your views but even I do not like that way of doing it. So what I had started following HackSoft's Django styleguide - https://github.com/HackSoftware/Django-Styleguide to write my Django code.

Django-Styleguide – Django styleguide used in HackSoft projects

> C/C++'s header system with conditional inclusion

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say something like "older build systems"? I don't think any of the things you listed are "modern". Which isn't a criticism of their legacy! They have been very useful for a long time, and that's to be applauded. But they have huge problems, which is a big part of why newer systems have been created.

FWIW, I have been using pants[0] (v2) for a little under a year. We chose it after also evaluating it and bazel (but not nix, for better or worse). I think it's really really great! Also painful in some ways (as is inevitably the case with any software). And of course it's nearly impossible to entirely stomp out "genrules" use cases. But it's much easier to get much closer to true hermeticity, and I'm a big fan of that.

0: https://www.pantsbuild.org/

Does pants/bazel can help me?

Hyper-large tech companies managing hyper-large monorepos using Bazel (google), buck (Facebook), please (thought machine), pants (Twitter, Foursquare & Square) enjoy them but also have a lot of resources devoted to running and maintaining it.

Yeah there's definitely some alternatives out there. Pants is another one that has a lot of traction.

You should look into pex, or it’s parent build system pants. A PEX (Python EXecutable) file can package up all your code including dependencies and run on another machine of similar OS with just an available compatible interpreter.

We don't have the CD yet, but I think what I put in place counts as simple CI (even if incomplete)? Every push & PR trigger an azure pipeline, which runs pants. This install the dependencies from the lockfile, run some linters, uses DVC to pull the data necessary for tests, and run unit tests (mypy check is deactivated until I solve a weird error). Basically the same script runs on laptops cross-platform (one of us uses Max, one Ubuntu with GPU, one Ubuntu with CPU, the scripts runs on every platform). The only difference with CI is the installation of Pants and the gestion of Cache (needs to be downloaded in CI so it takes ~3min in CI versus 20 seconds on my laptop).

This has also been recently integrated in pants.

https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/13393