ClassicUO VS budibase

Parallels or download the client at www.classicuo.eu. With the latter option, you will need the files from the client.

The unofficial ClassicUO client runs on Macs: https://www.classicuo.eu You likely just need to provide the actual client files which could be a hassle to obtain after every patch.

If you want to play on the Classic Client I would recommend UO Classic client mod that allows the game to run at full resolution and 60FPS. https://www.classicuo.eu

Oh, in terms of emulators written in C#, never heard of Run[1]UO[2]? C# revolutionized the UO world back like 20 years ago(?) it has(d?) the right balance between simplicity, clarity and performance

[1] https://www.runuo.net/

[2] https://github.com/ClassicUO/ClassicUO

no total skills cap you'll need the client files which doesn't run on linux itself, but then you can play using ClassicUO which is linux compatible

I checked it's not on there list of servers, yet. https://www.classicuo.eu/

ClassicUO is not the official client.

This is the client we’re talking about: https://www.classicuo.eu you can boost the frames up to 60-120fps and you’re able to resize the game window to your likings.

This gonna be OT: Ciao Tommaso, after reading your project README I think you would be interested to this project too: https://github.com/ClassicUO/ClassicUO

Budibase is great at generating CRUD apps based on a model.

https://budibase.com/

Congratulations to the Airplane team.

Is this Airtable moving in the direction of low-code rather than no code? Puts them up against tools like Budibase [https://github.com/Budibase/budibase] and Retool [Https://retool.com]

I skipped to chapter 9 in the article ("Clogged"), and it looked like Pipes failed because it didn't have a large enough team or a well-defined mission. As a result they couldn't offer a super robust product that would lure in enterprise users. "You could not purchase some number of guaranteed-to-work Pipes calls per month" is the quote from the article.

The reason I think that interesting is because that's the model these days for everything from AI tokens to Monday.com seats. It makes me feel like Pipes was before its time.

That said I've been collecting different "business glue" products that are similar to Pipes. To me, like you say, they aren't as interesting, exciting and intuitive as Pipes was, but maybe it just takes a little more digging. I tried to focus on open source tools but some aren't.

- n8n io: https://n8n.io/integrations/mondaycom/

- Node-RED: https://nodered.org/ (just read about this one in this thread)

- trigger dev: trigger.dev

- automatisch.io: https://automatisch.io/docs/

- Activepieces: https://www.activepieces.com/docs/getting-started/introducti...

- Huginn: https://github.com/huginn/huginn

- budibase: https://budibase.com/

- windmill: https://www.windmill.dev/

- tooljet: https://www.tooljet.com/workflows

- Bracket: https://www.usebracket.com/pricing (just SalesForce <-> PostgreSQL)

- Zapier: zapier.com/

Anyway I hope some of these are fun!

Budibase is open-source, including the workflow platform which has helped accelerate thousands of workflows already:

https://github.com/Budibase/budibase

(4) Budibase | Build internal tools in minutes, the easy way. https://budibase.com/.

Also missing these app builders, both of which are open source but offer managed hosting:

* Budibase https://budibase.com

Buildbase