Calibration-Shapes VS Cura-ArcWelderPlugin

When in doubt run some calibration prints, I made my own but this model is probably better https://github.com/5axes/Calibration-Shapes/wiki/Support-Test

The test case I used was the calibration cube in the in the [Calibration Shapes Plugin](https://github.com/5axes/Calibration-Shapes/wiki/Calibration-Cube-XYZ) printing the walls outside to in.

Also, you could try out a retraction tower: https://github.com/5axes/Calibration-Shapes

You should look into the Calibration Shapes plugin for Cura. It'll let you generate many different towers quickly and the GitHub for it has the post-processing scripts that make them work.

I generally recommend printing a temperature tower to find the correct temperature for your filament and the settings you currently use. Pick the segment with the best result in bridging and surface.

The first thing I would recommend is to level your bed again and the second thing is to print a temperature tower so that you can find the right temperature for the filament and your printing profile.

CalibrationShapes has a bed level pattern I like to use. Keep printing and adjusting your corners until you have the perfect squish, and you will find your adhesion will be much better!

Personally, I always use this project for the temperature tower which also starts from the highest temperature and then drops lower and lower.

For other slicers, you will need to use a script like ArcWelder (Cura Plugin) (Script for other slicers)

I also see you are running jyers, is it possible to switch to the latest professional or Marlin bugfix branch? Lots of fixes that went it and professional also has support for arc welder https://github.com/fieldOfView/Cura-ArcWelderPlugin which is very useful in prints like these incase if faulty sdcards as such

It is always possible that either my plugin or the command line gcode processor that does the arcwelding magic does something it is not supposed to, but unless that gets reported in the proper channels with the required logs to see what happened, there is nothing I can do about it and - if it is indeed an issue with my plugin - it will not be fixed. The proper channel is https://github.com/fieldofview/cura-arcwelderplugin/issues

The only thing you can do is try archwelder https://github.com/fieldOfView/Cura-ArcWelderPluginfor either the Octoprint or the Cura. It will reduce the number of tiny movements by combining them into larger ones, so you get less zits.