Agents.jl VS racket

We mean the standard "agent based model" https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.082080899, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent-based_model . The kind of thing you'd use Agents.jl for. For example, look at agent-based infection models. In these kind of models you create many individuals (agents) with rules. Each agent moves around, but if one is standing near an agent that is infected, there's a probability of infecting the nearby agent. What is the average percentage of infected people at time t?

Jullia has packages too.

Agent-based modeling looks like an interesting topic, something ripe for fun little side projects. The short (three paragraph) "Crash course on agent based modeling" [1] from the package docs gave me an idea of why ABM is useful, and scrolling through the example model [2] kinda answers what conveniences the package gives me over implementing the simulation myself.

Has anyone here used ABM for a serious project? Fields like economics and sociology are mentioned, but how prevalent is Agent based modeling in those fields in practice?

[1] https://juliadynamics.github.io/Agents.jl/stable/#Crash-cour...

Are the pieces the agents? I would recommend looking at Collaborative Diffusion for some examples of combining agent-based techniques with game modeling. As for frameworks, check out agentpy or Agents.jl for alternatives that are moreso software libraries that presume knowledge of programming.

I has a look to Julia too. There are nice tools build by JuliaDynamics. I.e. Agents.jl for agent based modeling. It handles collisions. There is also a framework for reinforcement learning. Also for Genetic Algorithms. Then I found a set of libraries related to Geometry. But it seems to be a lot of work to put that together for my use case.

For agent based modelling, you've come to the right place because Agents.jl is great! It has a way to get interactive visualisations from your models, although I haven't used it myself. See this year's JuliaCon talk about Agents.jl to get an idea of what it can do.

I'm always happy to find you have documentation ;). The doc from https://github.com/JuliaDynamics/Agents.jl was pretty helpful to a noob like me.

Here is the issue. Someone already commented saying it's due to a change in InteractiveDynamics.jl and referenced a pull request. I guess all we need to do is wait.

Racket—the Language-Oriented Programming Language—version 8.12 is now available from https://racket-lang.org

See https://racket.discourse.group/t/racket-v8-12-is-now-availab... for the release announcement and highlights.

Thank you to the many people who contributed to this release!

Feedback Welcome

Racket version 8.11.1 is now available from https://racket-lang.org/

Racket (https://racket-lang.org) has an IDE (DrRacket) which isn't EMACS. ARC (which powers hacker news) is (was?) written in Racket.

Nice! Repeating a comment I just made on HN: I signed up for RacketCon, will be joining remotely. I am looking forward to it a lot. Usually I use the Racket language perhaps for 10% of my personal projects, but I am currently writing a Racket AI book, so all things Racket are of current interest. Past RacketCons have been a lot of fun. I usually use Common Lisp, but Racket is batteries included Scheme, and more, and is a very pleasant language and ecosystem. Just in case you don’t have Racket installed: https://racket-lang.org/

I signed up for RacketCon, joining remotely. I am looking forward to it a lot. Usually I use the Racket language perhaps for 10% of my personal projects, but I am currently writing a Racket AI book, so all things Racket are of current interest.

Past RacketCons have been a lot of fun.

I usually use Common Lisp, but Racket is batteries included Scheme, and more, and is a very pleasant language and ecosystem. Just in case you don’t have Racket installed: https://racket-lang.org/

I'd suggest Racket (https://racket-lang.org) which is a batteries-included language environment that includes scheme and has a lot of high-quality documentation.

Guile (https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/) isn't quite as learner-focused but is another great choice.

How did I get to the bottom of the page and not ONE person has recommended racket?

The Racket fork of CS supports Apple Silicon natively, and can be installed independently: https://github.com/racket/racket/blob/master/racket/src/ChezScheme/BUILDING Chez adds a few features (threads, ffi, ...) to R6RS; there is a useful combined index to TSPL4 and the CS User Guide at http://cisco.github.io/ChezScheme/csug9.5/csug_1.html

If you're using SICP in Scheme (or are you doing the JS version?) then you may want to look at How to Design Programs. It uses Racket which is a Scheme descendent so much of the language you've learned in SICP will work in it without issue. It also has a pretty good set of GUI and drawing capabilities you can find through the Racket docs page and will use some of with HTDP.