lisp VS rumi

I've been curious about https://github.com/ezekiiel/lust but I don't know its status as a project

Since last month I've been working on garbage collection and string handling in my Lisp compiler. I've found writing the garbage collector to be hard but strings are fun :)

I just added variable-arity functions to my lisp which compiles to Cranelift. I was blocked for a while trying to work out how to convince Cranelift to put arguments on the stack but eventually gave up and I now heap allocate a location for function arguments. It's not great for performance but it feels great to have finally finished it!

I’ve been carrying on working on compiling my lisp this month. It’s been a fun couple weeks because I’ve finally gotten to the fun stuff like higher order functions, closures, and adding the ability to call into libc.

Yes, with rumi, here is an extreme example (look at other tests, they are nicer): https://github.com/MCSH/rumi/blob/master/tests/test8.rum

I've written a proof of concept programming language explicitly for this purpose called rumi. Take a look https://github.com/mcsh/rumi . The thing that makes this possible is a macro language that is basically the language itself, and can communicate with the compiler to define macros / query syntax / change the generated code etc. Basically you have the power to write an entirely new programming language with the macros.

Here is the code to rumi: https://github.com/MCSH/rumi