The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning. Learn more →
Wolfssl Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to wolfssl
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
dapr
Dapr is a portable, event-driven, runtime for building distributed applications across cloud and edge.
-
cryptography
cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers.
-
SheetJS js-xlsx
📗 SheetJS Spreadsheet Data Toolkit -- New home https://git.sheetjs.com/SheetJS/sheetjs
-
Tink
Discontinued Tink is a multi-language, cross-platform, open source library that provides cryptographic APIs that are secure, easy to use correctly, and hard(er) to misuse.
-
mbedTLS
An open source, portable, easy to use, readable and flexible TLS library, and reference implementation of the PSA Cryptography API. Releases are on a varying cadence, typically around 3 - 6 months between releases.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
wolfssl reviews and mentions
-
“Purchasing an arm”
Or something a bit more lightweight - https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl
- WolfSSL
- Security Advisory 2022-10-04-1 - wolfSSL buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake (CVE-2022-39173)
- Getting started with wolfssl
-
Ask HN: Can a TCP connection be MitM attacked if already established?
> I have no room for TLS on micro computer
How micro is your micro? There are embedded TLS stacks such as wolfSSL[1]. If you carefully select the cipher suite and certificate requirements, and perhaps limit TLS payload sizes, you may be able to fit on a lot more systems than you initially suspect. x.509 is expensive in code space though, if that's the constraint, you may do better with an application specific certificate replacement of some sort.
[1] https://www.wolfssl.com/
- The project with a single 11,000-line code file
- Information and learning resources for cryptography newcomers
-
CryptoLyzer: A comprehensive cryptographic settings analyzer
There are many notable open-source projects (SSLyze, CipherScan, testssl.sh, tls-scan, …) and several SaaS solutions (CryptCheck, CypherCraft, Hardenize, ImmuniWeb, Mozilla Observatory, SSL Labs, …) to do a security setting analysis, especially when we are talking about TLS, which is the most common and popular cryptographic protocol. However, most of these tools heavily depend on one or more versions of one or more cryptographic protocol libraries, like GnuTLS, OpenSSL, or wolfSSL. But why is this such a problem?
-
FOSS News International #2: November 8-145, 2021
wolfSSL 5.0.0
- WolfSSL Release 5.0.0
-
A note from our sponsor - WorkOS
workos.com | 26 Apr 2024
Stats
wolfSSL/wolfssl is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 only which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of wolfssl is C.
Sponsored