InfluxDB is the Time Series Platform where developers build real-time applications for analytics, IoT and cloud-native services. Easy to start, it is available in the cloud or on-premises. Learn more →
Wit-bindgen Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to wit-bindgen
-
-
component-model
Repository for design and specification of the Component Model
-
InfluxDB
Build time-series-based applications quickly and at scale.. InfluxDB is the Time Series Platform where developers build real-time applications for analytics, IoT and cloud-native services. Easy to start, it is available in the cloud or on-premises.
-
-
spin
Spin is an open source framework for building and running fast, secure, and composable cloud microservices with WebAssembly
-
webassembly-tour
⚙️ Take you through a tour of WebAssembly (WASM targets on WASI) with wasmCloud, Krustlet, WAGI, etc. 🌟 Give it a star if you like it.
-
-
wasi-experimental-http
Experimental outbound HTTP support for WebAssembly and WASI
-
SonarQube
Static code analysis for 29 languages.. Your projects are multi-language. So is SonarQube analysis. Find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells so you can release quality code every time. Get started analyzing your projects today for free.
-
-
-
-
-
spec
WebAssembly specification, reference interpreter, and test suite. (by WebAssembly)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
wai
A language binding generator for `wai` (a precursor to WebAssembly interface types) (by wasmerio)
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
wit-bindgen reviews and mentions
-
WebAssembly: Adding Python Support to WASM Language Runtimes
Wasmtime's `wasmtime-py` embedding in python has support for Wasm Components: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime-py#components (disclosure, I helped create it)
The remaining piece of the puzzle would be to create a wit-bindgen guest generator https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen#guests for this build of the python interpreter. You could then seamlessly call back and forth between the host and guest pythons, without even knowing that wasmtime is under the hood.
-
Wasmer takes WebAssembly libraries mainstream with WAI
Interesting little discussion linked about this fork of WAI from wit-bindgen:
-
Extism: Make all software programmable with WebAssembly
Is the interface defined through wit?
-
Blackjack, the rusty procedural 3d modeler 🦀 continues to grow with new features! Here's the latest PR with the changelog
PS: wasm interface types proposal is dead. there's a new proposal called component model which is being implemented in wit-bindgen + wasmtime https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen/issues/314
-
Turbocharge your application development using WebAssembly with SingleStoreDB
[package] name = "sentimentable" version = "0.1.0" edition = "2021" # See more keys and their definitions at https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html [dependencies] wit-bindgen-rust = { git = "https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen.git", rev = "60e3c5b41e616fee239304d92128e117dd9be0a7" } vader_sentiment = { git = "https://github.com/ckw017/vader-sentiment-rust" } lazy_static = "1.4.0" [lib] crate-type = ["cdylib"]
-
What is the best way to create platform agnostic wasm packages with Rust?
Sounds to me like you're looking for wit-bindgen.
-
We're working on a new WASM/Rust scripting system. Here I'm playing around with a script that changes the day/night cycle.
We're using wasmtime for the runtime, and for communication, we're using wit-bindgen with some wrappers on both ends.
-
Wasmtime Reaches 1.0: Fast, Safe and Production Ready!
it is still very very very experimental. https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen/issues/314 is tracking the last few steps required to have a basic proof of concept of component model proposal.
-
The Risks of WebAssembly
> But we have been noticing an unfortunate trend that some developers have chosen to work contrary to the component model, creating strong links to their own host runtimes. Going this route results in platform lock-in on one hand, and the pointless re-authoring of the same code (tooled for slightly different hosts) on the other.
Oh dear lord. This is such a twisted narrative. The Component Model is a proposal that is only supported by one runtime out of the 20 used in production, none of them in the browser (don't look for it in v8, SpiderMonkey or Javascript Core, Wazero, Wasmer, Wizard Engine, WAVM, ...). So if there's anything that actually locks you in... is probably that!
Even when Wasmer tried to add support for it on wit-bindgen (precursor for the Component Model), the same people from the Bytecode Alliance who are working on the Component Model proposal rejected it [1]. Do they really want collaboration and not lock-in? One begins to wonder.
It gets even more funny when you continue reading the article and you also realize that all people in the WasmDay committee that decides what get's in our out their CNCF conference are also part of the Bytecode Alliance. When the only competition they "cheer" is the one that comes from their approved friends.
I would highly encourage everyone to read some of the practices of the Bytecode Alliance that the AssemblyScript community has redacted, it might be eye opening! [2]
[1] https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen/issues/306
[2] https://www.assemblyscript.org/standards-objections.html
-
What do you wish Anki could do that it currently can't?
Core functionality is in Rust compiled to WebAssembly. Add-ons also use WebAssembly. I'm using wit-bindgen for generation of API bindings.
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 7 Feb 2023
Stats
bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.