Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →
Trialyzer Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to trialyzer based on common topics and language
-
keyboard_layout_optimizer
A keyboard layout optimizer supporting multiple layers. Implemented in Rust.
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
keyman
Keyman cross platform input methods system running on Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows and mobile and desktop web
-
keyboard-layout
keyboard-layout pools all the needed files to set up my custom XKB keyboard layout (takbl) on Linux Ubuntu.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
trialyzer reviews and mentions
-
Genetically Optimized Keyboard Layout
Regarding your future plans, take a look at the trialyzer project. They follow a similar approach as far as I understand.
-
DSFB analysis only makes sense for same-hand trigrams, doesn't it?
This is a table of trigram categories. The full explanation is here but we are interested in the sfs subcategories, which is my name for a DSFB in trigram form. sfs.alt is an alternating DSFB, the others are various forms of same-hand DSFBs.
-
How would you weigh SFBs / DSFBs vs. roll total / roll ratio (in:out) vs. redirects / "bad" redirects
As part of an analyzer, I typed a few thousand trigrams and measured the median speed of each. Here are the results. Each point represents the median speed of one trigram, broken down into bigram parts (the breaks down into th and he, which don't necessarily take the same amount of time each).
-
Which one is better?
I actually made a whole layout analyzer based on physical experimental measurements of how quickly you can type various trigrams. Some sfbs were definitely slower than others, as you predicted, but all of them were far worse than non-same-finger sequences. The highest rated layouts (with the fastest speed ceilings, therefore the least strain required to reach any given slower speed) all had SFB frequencies of about 1.2% or lower, even when the heatmaps were a bit wonky--for a while, the top scoring layout had t in the qwerty v position. But it had less than 0.8% sfb!
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 3 May 2024
Stats
samuelxyz/trialyzer is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of trialyzer is Python.
Popular Comparisons
Sponsored