Setup-buildx-action Alternatives

setup-buildx-action reviews and mentions

• Docker buildx: action suddenly failing with no change in workflows
  1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Sep 2024
• Got permission denied while trying to connect to the Docker daemon socket?
  2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Sep 2024

  Is it this? https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/issues/358

• GitHub Actions Are a Problem
  19 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Nov 2023

  Good luck running this locally. There's no script code to speak of, just references to external "actions" and parameters (for example, https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action).

  Some CI platforms are just a simple glue layer (Gitlab CI - which I prefer - is one of them), but in most cases Github CI is not. Maybe it adds to the author frustration?

• Automate Docker Image Builds and Push to Docker Hub Using GitHub Actions 🐳🐙
  10 projects | dev.to | 1 Mar 2023

  Set up Docker Buildx: We will use the docker/setup-buildx-action action to set up Docker Buildx.

• One Dockerfile is all it takes, falling in love with bake
  5 projects | dev.to | 16 Jan 2023

  There’s an amazing docker/bake-action which makes it insanely easy to build all of your containers in the most optimal way. Since we’ve set the group “default” block in the docker-bake.hcl, config is very minimal. One step in your GitHub Action workflow file will build all of your images and will push all of your cache layers, tag all of your containers, and push all your final images. You’ll still have to do things like checkout the code and don’t forget that you’ll want to use the docker/setup-buildx-action since bake is a buildx feature. There’s one quick gotcha for the actual docker/bake-action. We don’t want to push PR builds and we don’t want to pollute the cache with PR builds.

• Building with Qemu via Github Actions taking forever. What other options are there?
  3 projects | /r/docker | 1 Dec 2022

  To be clear, that article does NOT provide a solution for avoiding QEMU. I suggested it because it describes "the hard way" to get a single image multi-arch image. The github action crazy-max/ghaction-docker-buildx has been archived and replaced by docker/setup-qemu-action and docker/setup-buildx-action, which it seems like you were already using.

• Pushing Cutom Images to Docker Hub using GitHub Actions
  7 projects | dev.to | 30 Sep 2022

  Third step is docker/setup-buildx-action configures buildx, which is a Docker CLI plugin that provides enhanced build capabilities.

• Containerizing Laravel Applications
  8 projects | dev.to | 23 Sep 2022

  We then use the docker/setup-buildx-action action to initialize an environment to build Docker images:

• How to use Docker layer caching in GitHub Actions
  2 projects | dev.to | 27 Jun 2022

  The setup-buildx-action configures Docker Buildx to create a builder instance for running the image build. The following step build-push-action, makes use of that instance to build your Docker image. The build-push-action supports all of the features provided by BuildKit out of the box. In our simple example, we are only specifying the Docker context, but more advanced features like SSH, secrets, and build args are supported.

• Why Darwin Failed (2006)
  3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 31 May 2022
• A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
  www.saashub.com | 4 Oct 2024

  SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →