setup-buildx-action VS build-push-action

Is it this? https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action/issues/358

Good luck running this locally. There's no script code to speak of, just references to external "actions" and parameters (for example, https://github.com/docker/setup-buildx-action).

Some CI platforms are just a simple glue layer (Gitlab CI - which I prefer - is one of them), but in most cases Github CI is not. Maybe it adds to the author frustration?

Set up Docker Buildx: We will use the docker/setup-buildx-action action to set up Docker Buildx.

There’s an amazing docker/bake-action which makes it insanely easy to build all of your containers in the most optimal way. Since we’ve set the group “default” block in the docker-bake.hcl, config is very minimal. One step in your GitHub Action workflow file will build all of your images and will push all of your cache layers, tag all of your containers, and push all your final images. You’ll still have to do things like checkout the code and don’t forget that you’ll want to use the docker/setup-buildx-action since bake is a buildx feature. There’s one quick gotcha for the actual docker/bake-action. We don’t want to push PR builds and we don’t want to pollute the cache with PR builds.

To be clear, that article does NOT provide a solution for avoiding QEMU. I suggested it because it describes "the hard way" to get a single image multi-arch image. The github action crazy-max/ghaction-docker-buildx has been archived and replaced by docker/setup-qemu-action and docker/setup-buildx-action, which it seems like you were already using.

Third step is docker/setup-buildx-action configures buildx, which is a Docker CLI plugin that provides enhanced build capabilities.

We then use the docker/setup-buildx-action action to initialize an environment to build Docker images:

The setup-buildx-action configures Docker Buildx to create a builder instance for running the image build. The following step build-push-action, makes use of that instance to build your Docker image. The build-push-action supports all of the features provided by BuildKit out of the box. In our simple example, we are only specifying the Docker context, but more advanced features like SSH, secrets, and build args are supported.

Configuring the GitHub Actions Workflow We set up a GitHub Actions workflow to automate the integration and deployment process. The integration workflow is triggered on every pull request while the deployment workflow was triggered upon the completion of the build and push workflow for docker images gotten from the marketplace. It used the appleboy/ssh-action to execute the deployment script on the server.

We use the docker/build-push-action to build the application image. In addition to setting the correct tag, the image build step must also provide a label matching your service name. Because the image should be pushed to your container registry, we set push: true, and because we want ludicrous build speed we instruct the build step to utilize the GitHub Actions cache.

name: Lint and Dockerize the app on: push: branches: [master] pull_request: branches: [master] env: # Use docker.io for Docker Hub if empty REGISTRY: docker.io # github.repository as / IMAGE_NAME: ${{ github.repository }} jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest permissions: contents: read packages: write steps: - name: Checkout repository uses: actions/checkout@v2 - name: Set up Google Cloud uses: google-github-actions/[email protected] with: project_id: ${{ secrets.GCP_PROJECT_ID }} service_account_key: ${{ secrets.GCP_SA_KEY }} # Login against a Docker registry except on PR # https://github.com/docker/login-action - name: Log into registry ${{ env.REGISTRY }} # if: github.event_name != 'pull_request' uses: docker/login-action@v1 with: username: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_USERNAME }} password: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_PASSWORD }} # Extract metadata (tags, labels) for Docker # https://github.com/docker/metadata-action #- name: Extract Docker metadata # id: meta # uses: docker/metadata-action@98669ae865ea3cffbcbaa878cf57c20bbf1c6c38 # with: # images: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/${{ env.IMAGE_NAME }} # Build and push Docker image with Buildx (don't push on PR) # https://github.com/docker/build-push-action - name: Build and push Docker image uses: docker/build-push-action@v2 with: context: ./ tags: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_USERNAME }}/magga:latest push: true file: ./Dockerfile - name: Image digest run: echo

docker/build-push-action@v4 to build and push Docker images with Buildx.

Hmmm interesting question... I use the following in my yaml: yaml - name: Build and push uses: https://github.com/docker/build-push-action@v2 can't you just use like: yaml - name: NTFY uses: https://github.com/dawidd6/action-send-mail@v3 and use the actions explained in the links?

Docker made some decent actions free to use like this one to build and push docker images to registries.

Build and push Docker image: We will use the docker/build-push-action action to build and push the Docker image to Docker Hub. We will use the following inputs:

I previously tried to use Docker `docker/setup-qemu-action@v2` and `docker/setup-buildx-action@v2` for this purpose (see that example https://github.com/docker/build-push-action#git-context). Thanks to buildkit, platform switching works transparently. However, building on ARM via QEMU on GitHub Actions is terribly slow (something like 5 times more), which is hard to accept. Therefore, full of hope, I am waiting for GitHub Actions to make cloud runners available on ARM, because it is a blocker for the implementation of Graviton on the AWS environment for us.

For a while, the blocker in GitHub Actions for providing ARM support was that Azure doesn't have ARM support. In this way, the Azure cloud offering may determine the habits of AWS consumers.