SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Proposal-class-fields Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to proposal-class-fields
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
proposal-record-tuple
ECMAScript proposal for the Record and Tuple value types. | Stage 2: it will change!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Agora-ReactNative-Dynamic-Rooms
Dynamic Video Chat Rooms in React Native using Agora RTC and RTM SDKs. The RTC SDK is used to share live audio/video, RTM is used to signal the room details to all connected users.
-
-
-
-
proposal-static-class-features
Discontinued The static parts of new class features, in a separate proposal
-
proposal-private-fields-in-in
Discontinued EcmaScript proposal to provide brand checks without exceptions
-
proposal-class-fields discussion
proposal-class-fields reviews and mentions
-
Why is nobody talking about how much Proxies break Vue 3?
Private methods: Pretty simple to explain, private methods and fields straight up do not work with ES6 proxies, its a known issue https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/106
-
JS private class fields considered harmful
The #x syntax is ugly and many people don't like it. But if you understand how JavaScript works, you'll see that private x is not possible. Some comments on the proposal suggested private #x and there were plenty of other suggestions as well, it may be interesting to read through those discussions.
- Field declarations overwrite properties on the prototype
- Turning “hard private” into “soft private”
-
All JavaScript and TypeScript features of the last 3 years explained
> - # private... not sure why they didn't just use the "private" keyword, but I don't care. I almost always use TypeScript anyways
One of the reasons was to allow private and public fields of the same name, so that subclasses are free to add own public fields without accidentally discovering private fields. There were many more considerations that went into the design: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/blob/main/PRIV....
There was a heated debate about this and the choice of the # sigil back in 2015 at the time private fields were being designed: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-private-fields/issues/14.
- ES2022 Features!
-
JavaScript Evolutsiyasi Qisqa Satrlarda!
Private class fieldlari va nihoyat classlarda access modifierlarni (private,static) qo'llash imkonini beruvchi sintaksis.
-
Create Ref using React.createRef without using constructor in React?
class App extends React.Component { constructor(props) { super(props); this.state = { counter: 0 }; }} but due to Babel's class-field support, I don't use it anymore
-
Correct use of arrow functions in React
I am using ReactJS with Babel and Webpack and using ES6 as well as the proposed class fields for arrow functions. I understand that arrow functions make things more efficient by not recreating the functions each render similar to how binding in the constructor works. However, I am not 100% sure if I am using them correctly. The following is a simplified section of my code in three different files.
-
React component design patterns for 2022
Working with constructor and calling super() before we can set state. Although this has been solved with the introduction of class fields in JavaScript, Hooks still provide a simpler API
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 14 Oct 2024
Stats
The primary programming language of proposal-class-fields is HTML.
Popular Comparisons
- proposal-class-fields VS proposal-decorators
- proposal-class-fields VS proposal-private-methods
- proposal-class-fields VS cross-project-council
- proposal-class-fields VS notes
- proposal-class-fields VS Agora-ReactNative-Dynamic-Rooms
- proposal-class-fields VS proposal-bind-operator
- proposal-class-fields VS proposal-private-fields
- proposal-class-fields VS proposals
- proposal-class-fields VS proposal-deep-path-properties-for-record
- proposal-class-fields VS proposal-observable