proposal-pipeline-operator

A proposal for adding a useful pipe operator to JavaScript. (by tc39)

Proposal-pipeline-operator Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to proposal-pipeline-operator

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better proposal-pipeline-operator alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to proposal-pipeline-operator

Reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-pipeline-operator. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-10-19.
  • A proposal for adding a pipe operator to JavaScript
  • Pipe Operator for JavaScript
    news.ycombinator.com | 2021-10-19
    Does anybody more involved in this topic know how high the chance of this getting implemented is? It mentions that this has been rejected twice before, mainly for runtime optimization reasons, and that there is another proposal [1] that mentions this as an extension to it's functionality.

    1: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator

    news.ycombinator.com | 2021-10-19
    news.ycombinator.com | 2021-10-19
  • Upside down pipe operator: illusions and perspectives
    reddit.com/r/JSdev | 2021-10-11
    Let's talk about javascript's favorite bikeshed: The pipeline proposal proposal.
  • Write better JavaScript, function composition with pipe and compose
    For those interested in these concepts make sure to checkout the pipe operator proposal, which seeks to formalize this concept in the language itself. This would mean that you do not need the pipe() function.
    Or, using Hack pipeline operator proposal:
  • Are Observable a bit of an overkill?
    reddit.com/r/Angular2 | 2021-10-08
    That said, I've been keeping a close eye on the proposed Pipe Operator, which is Stage 2 already (likely to be accepted to the standard, eventually). If we get that operator, we could dramatically clean up API's like RxJS and make them much more readable / useable.
  • The current tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator Hack-style |> hijacks Grouping operator ( )
    dev.to | 2021-09-25
    Current TC39 proposal Hack Pipeline Operator |> is incompatible with Grouping operator ().
  • Prior difficulty persuading TC39 about F# pipes and partial function application
    news.ycombinator.com | 2021-09-25
  • Currying in JavaScript
    news.ycombinator.com | 2021-09-19
    There’s a lot of bikeschedding on how to use it in conjunction with the (also stage 1 proposal and forever delayed) pipeline operator[1] unfortunately. Add in never ending arguments on which symbol we should use (the questionmark has a lot of responsibilities already) and here we are.

    To make matters worse it appear that generally OOP style darlings such as static class blocks and true private fields seem to gain more momentum.

    [1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator/wiki

    news.ycombinator.com | 2021-09-19
    We were hoping for similar operators in JavaScript (pipeline `|>` and partial application `?`). However TC39 just decided earlier this month that we users of the language are not worthy of such powers. This was off course meet with a lot of resentment from many JavaScript developers, including my self.

    https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator

    news.ycombinator.com | 2021-09-19

Stats

Basic proposal-pipeline-operator repo stats
48
5,772
8.1
5 days ago

tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator is an open source project licensed under BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License which is an OSI approved license.

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
Find remote HTML jobs at our new job board 99remotejobs.com. There is 1 new remote job listed recently.
Are you hiring? Post a new remote job listing for free.