SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Openapi-python-client Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to openapi-python-client
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
JHipster
JHipster, much like Spring initializr, is a generator to create a boilerplate backend application, but also with an integrated front end implementation in React, Vue or Angular. In their own words, it "Is a development platform to quickly generate, develop, & deploy modern web applications & microservice architectures."
-
cookiecutter
A cross-platform command-line utility that creates projects from cookiecutters (project templates), e.g. Python package projects, C projects.
-
Lark
Lark is a parsing toolkit for Python, built with a focus on ergonomics, performance and modularity.
-
Flake8
flake8 is a python tool that glues together pycodestyle, pyflakes, mccabe, and third-party plugins to check the style and quality of some python code.
-
pytest
The pytest framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing
-
sqlx
🧰 The Rust SQL Toolkit. An async, pure Rust SQL crate featuring compile-time checked queries without a DSL. Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite. (by launchbadge)
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
openapi-python-client reviews and mentions
-
GraphQL is for Backend Engineers
On the backend, developers either need to manually document the entire API or rely on auto-generation tools that don’t fully meet their needs. Consumers face the same choice, write code by hand or workaround the bugs in their SDK generator (stated, lovingly, as the maintainer of an OpenAPI client generator). On top of this, these solutions result in inconsistent understandings of the API. Reproducing errors becomes time-consuming and frustrating, which feels like a battle instead of a collaboration. What we need is a shared language to describe how the API works—one that doesn’t add unnecessary layers of abstraction or manual work.
-
Microsoft Kiota: CLI for generating an API client to call OpenAPI-described API
Has anyone tried Kiota, specifically the Python support? How does it compare to https://github.com/openapi-generators/openapi-python-client ?
-
Python toolkits
I think we use these - https://github.com/openapi-generators/openapi-python-client
-
YAML: It's Time to Move On
Thanks for the link, but not necessarily.
How WSDL and the code generation around it worked, was that you'd have a specification of the web API (much like OpenAPI attempts to do), which you could feed into any number of code generators, to get output code which has no coupling to the actual generator at runtime, whereas Pyotr is geared more towards validation and goes into the opposite direction: https://pyotr.readthedocs.io/en/latest/client/
The best analogy that i can think of is how you can also do schema first application development - you do your SQL migrations (ideally in an automated way as well) and then just run a command locally to generate all of the data access classes and/or models for your database tables within your application. That way, you save your time for 80% of the boring and repetitive stuff while minimizing the risks of human error and inconsistencies, while nothing preventing you from altering the generated code if you have specific needs (outside of needing to make it non overrideable, for example, a child class of a generated class). Of course, there's no reason why this can't be applied to server code either - write the spec first and generate stubs for endpoints that you'll just fill out.
Similarly there shouldn't be a need for a special client to generate stubs for OpenAPI, the closest that Python in particular has for now is this https://github.com/openapi-generators/openapi-python-client
However, for some reason, model driven development never really took off, outside of niche frameworks, like JHipster: https://www.jhipster.tech/
Furthermore, for whatever reason formal specs for REST APIs also never really got popular and aren't regarded as the standard, which to me seems silly: every bit of client code that you write will need a specific version to work against, which should be formalized.
-
Replacing FastAPI with Rust: Part 2 - Research
Tallying up the results, we get 7/8 "MUST" requirements met. I think that Paperclip + actix-web seems like the most promising candidate. I'm really not opposed to writing the OpenAPI v3 construction myself as I've worked with the structure a fair bit in my openapi-python-client project (shameless plug).
-
Replacing FastAPI with Rust: Part 1 - Intro
Automatic documentation via OpenAPI, which lets you do things like generate Python code that knows how to talk to your API.
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 26 Apr 2024
Stats
triaxtec/openapi-python-client is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of openapi-python-client is Python.
Popular Comparisons
- openapi-python-client VS sqlx
- openapi-python-client VS starlark
- openapi-python-client VS paperclip
- openapi-python-client VS okapi
- openapi-python-client VS warp
- openapi-python-client VS yaml-reference-parser
- openapi-python-client VS JHipster
- openapi-python-client VS fastapi
- openapi-python-client VS rweb
- openapi-python-client VS actix-web
Sponsored