Rustup.rs Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to rustup.rs

ShellCheck

488 34,995 8.7 Haskell rustup.rs VS ShellCheck

ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts
ale

133 13,276 8.7 Vim Script rustup.rs VS ale

Check syntax in Vim/Neovim asynchronously and fix files, with Language Server Protocol (LSP) support
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
murex

55 1,370 9.6 Go rustup.rs VS murex

A smarter shell and scripting environment with advanced features designed for usability, safety and productivity (eg smarter DevOps tooling)
docker-flask-example

31 549 7.8 Python rustup.rs VS docker-flask-example

A production ready example Flask app that's using Docker and Docker Compose.
shelljs

27 14,139 6.4 JavaScript rustup.rs VS shelljs

:shell: Portable Unix shell commands for Node.js
bash-language-server

23 1,937 9.4 TypeScript rustup.rs VS bash-language-server

A language server for Bash
hck

15 679 4.6 Rust rustup.rs VS hck

A sharp cut(1) clone.
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
shfmt

10 26 10.0 Makefile rustup.rs VS shfmt

Dockernized shfmt. This formats shell script. (by tmknom)
cspell

8 1,114 9.8 TypeScript rustup.rs VS cspell

A Spell Checker for Code!
bish

3 1,480 0.0 C++ rustup.rs VS bish

Bish is a language that compiles to Bash. It's designed to give shell scripting a more comfortable and modern feel.
bashate

2 324 3.0 Python rustup.rs VS bashate

Code style enforcement for bash programs. Mirror of code maintained at opendev.org.
shfmt

2 84 0.0 Go rustup.rs VS shfmt

A shell formatter (sh/bash/mksh)
Bash-Checkstyle

2 4 0.0 Python rustup.rs VS Bash-Checkstyle

CI tool to verify some degree of Google Style Guide for Bash compliance.
shlint

1 43 10.0 Perl rustup.rs VS shlint

Discontinued A shell linting utility.
SaaSHub

www.saashub.com sponsored

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better rustup.rs alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to rustup.rs

rustup.rs reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of rustup.rs. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-20.

Ask HN: Let's Build CheckStyle for Bash?
15 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 20 Feb 2022

Much of the time that people are writing shell scripts, they're writing them not because they prefer shell syntax to that of some other language, but rather because they're creating a script that needs to be widely disseminated/deployed to all sorts of machines with unpredictable install bases.
This is why a large fraction of the shell scripts that exist in the world still hold to Bourne shell syntax, rather than using any of the syntax extensions from its descendant shells — Bourne shell (or at least, something at /bin/sh that interprets Bourne-shell syntax) is part of the POSIX standard. So you can expect any POSIX system — no matter how weird — to be able to run (Bourne) shell scripts. You can run them on Alpine. You can run them on Busybox. You can run them on your NAS. You can run them on your router. You can run them in your initramfs, on your Kubernetes nodes, on your Mosix nodes, whatever.
For an example of the type of script I'm talking about — see e.g. the script you download+run when you run the command-line on https://rustup.rs: https://github.com/hsivonen/rustup.rs/blob/master/rustup-ini...
There's absolutely no benefit that this script gets from being written directly in POSIX-compiliant Bourne shell syntax, rather than being written in something that compiles to it; any more than programs for your PC would benefit from being written directly in ASM rather than in something that compiles to it.