Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more β
Code-eval Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to code-eval
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
guidance
Discontinued A guidance language for controlling large language models. [Moved to: https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance] (by microsoft)
-
exllama
A more memory-efficient rewrite of the HF transformers implementation of Llama for use with quantized weights.
-
open_llama
OpenLLaMA, a permissively licensed open source reproduction of Meta AIβs LLaMA 7B trained on the RedPajama dataset
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
WizardLM
Discontinued Family of instruction-following LLMs powered by Evol-Instruct: WizardLM, WizardCoder and WizardMath
-
Local-LLM-Comparison-Colab-UI
Compare the performance of different LLM that can be deployed locally on consumer hardware. Run yourself with Colab WebUI.
-
azure-search-openai-demo
A sample app for the Retrieval-Augmented Generation pattern running in Azure, using Azure AI Search for retrieval and Azure OpenAI large language models to power ChatGPT-style and Q&A experiences.
-
llm-jeopardy
Automated prompting and scoring framework to evaluate LLMs using updated human knowledge prompts
-
code-interpreter-packages
A list of all packages and their descriptions in code interpreter as of 12 July 2023
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
code-eval reviews and mentions
-
Ask HN: LLM Leaderboard for Code Generation?
You're looking for "HumanEval" tests. Not saying this is the best way to test it, but it's the only standard test I know of that code models are compared with and are commonly benchmarked for
The current best models you'd want to try that I'm aware of is WizardCoder(15B), Starcoder(15B), and replit's code model(3B). Replit's instruct model is interesting because of it's competitive performance while only being a 3B model so it's the easiest/fastest to use.
https://github.com/abacaj/code-eval - This is a large mostly up to date list of benchmarks
https://huggingface.co/WizardLM/WizardCoder-15B-V1.0 - has a chart with a mostly up to date comparison
-
LLaMA2 Chat 70B outperformed ChatGPT
You will want to look at HumanEval (https://github.com/abacaj/code-eval) and Eval+ (https://github.com/my-other-github-account/llm-humaneval-ben...) results for coding.
While Llama2 is an improvement over LLaMA v1, it's still nowhere near even the best open models (currently, sans test contamination, WizardCoder-15B, a StarCoder fine tune is at top). It's really not a competition atm though, ChatGPT-4 wipes the floor for coding atm.
-
Claude 2
Since I've been on a AI code-helper kick recently. According to the post, Claude 2 now 71.2%, a significant upgrade from 1.3 (56.0%). It isn't specified whether this is pass@1 or pass@10.
For comparison:
* GPT-4 claims 85.4 on HumanEval, in a recent paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.11366.pdf GPT-4 was tested at 80.1 pass@1 and 91 pass@1 using their Reflexion technique. They also include MBPP and Leetcode Hard benchmark comparisons
* WizardCoder, a StarCoder fine-tune is one of the top open models, scoring a 57.3 pass@1, model card here: https://huggingface.co/WizardLM/WizardCoder-15B-V1.0
* The best open model I know of atm is replit-code-instruct-glaive, a replit-code-3b fine tune, which scores a 63.5% pass@1. An independent developer abacaj has reproduced that announcement as part of code-eval, a repo for getting human-eval results: https://github.com/abacaj/code-eval
Those interested in this area may also want to take a look at this repo https://github.com/my-other-github-account/llm-humaneval-ben... that also ranks with Eval+, the CanAiCode Leaderboard https://huggingface.co/spaces/mike-ravkine/can-ai-code-resul... and airate https://github.com/catid/supercharger/tree/main/airate
Also, as with all LLM evals, to be taken with a grain of salt...
Liu, Jiawei, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, and Lingming Zhang. βIs Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation.β arXiv, June 12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01210.
-
Which LLM works for taboo questions or programming like webscraping?
To get an idea of programming performance, my can-ai-code Leaderboard is freshly updated this morning, but also check out the excellent llm-eval and code-eval leaderboards.
-
GPT-4 API general availability
In terms of speed, we're talking about 140t/s for 7B models, and 40t/s for 33B models on a 3090/4090 now.[1] (1 token ~= 0.75 word) It's quite zippy. llama.cpp performs close on Nvidia GPUs now (but they don't have a handy chart) and you can get decent performance on 13B models on M1/M2 Macs.
You can take a look at a list of evals here: https://llm-tracker.info/books/evals/page/list-of-evals - for general usage, I think home-rolled evals like llm-jeopardy [2] and local-llm-comparison [3] by hobbyists are more useful than most of the benchmark rankings.
That being said, personally I mostly use GPT-4 for code assistance to that's what I'm most interested in, and the latest code assistants are scoring quite well: https://github.com/abacaj/code-eval - a recent replit-3b fine tune the human-eval results for open models (as a point of reference, GPT-3.5 gets 60.4 on pass@1 and 68.9 on pass@10 [4]) - I've only just started playing around with it since replit model tooling is not as good as llamas (doc here: https://llm-tracker.info/books/howto-guides/page/replit-mode...).
I'm interested in potentially applying reflexion or some of the other techniques that have been tried to even further increase coding abilities. (InterCode in particular has caught my eye https://intercode-benchmark.github.io/)
[1] https://github.com/turboderp/exllama#results-so-far
[2] https://github.com/aigoopy/llm-jeopardy
[3] https://github.com/Troyanovsky/Local-LLM-comparison/tree/mai...
[4] https://github.com/nlpxucan/WizardLM/tree/main/WizardCoder
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 2 May 2024
Stats
abacaj/code-eval is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of code-eval is Python.
Sponsored