Bytemuck Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to bytemuck based on common topics and language

crossbeam

42 6,846 8.6 Rust bytemuck VS crossbeam

Tools for concurrent programming in Rust
zerocopy

2 973 9.8 Rust bytemuck VS zerocopy
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com featured

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
wide

1 180 6.2 Rust bytemuck VS wide

A crate to help you go wide. By which I mean use SIMD stuff. (by Lokathor)
deno

448 92,975 9.9 Rust bytemuck VS deno

A modern runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript.
rust

2,683 93,041 10.0 Rust bytemuck VS rust

Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
safe_arch

1 41 4.5 Rust bytemuck VS safe_arch

Exposes arch-specific intrinsics as safe function (via cfg).
tinyvec

4 604 4.4 Rust bytemuck VS tinyvec

Just, really the littlest Vec you could need. So smol.
SaaSHub

www.saashub.com featured

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better bytemuck alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to bytemuck

bytemuck reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of bytemuck. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-09-16.

Where can I read about how to write a safe API for unsafe code?
3 projects | /r/rust | 16 Sep 2023

bytemuck uses a number of traits to provide safe APIs for bitcasts in cases where it's actually safe. This doesn't cover the full spectrum of safety in Rust (I imagine Send and Sync aren't too relevant here?), but if you can understand how this crate provides a safe API on top of a fair bit of unsafe, then you'll be well on your way here. (For extra credit, study zerocopy as well, which lives in a similar domain. Compare its use of unsafe and the functionality it provides with bytemuck.) I mention these crates because after a cursory look, they have decent comments describing safety obligations. So you have a decent chance of actually understanding the boundary between safe and unsafe here.
copying bytes from &[u32] to &mut [u8] the rust way
1 project | /r/rust | 11 Jun 2023

(Example: looking through the issues, bytemuck seemed to have a soundness issue just a few months ago: https://github.com/Lokathor/bytemuck/issues/170)