SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
708 Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to 708
-
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
-
-
-
STC
A modern, user friendly, generic, type-safe and fast C99 container library: String, Vector, Sorted and Unordered Map and Set, Deque, Forward List, Smart Pointers, Bitset and Random numbers. (by stclib)
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better 708 alternative or higher similarity.
708 reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of 708.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-23.
-
CppFront Parameter Passing Semantics
Herb's parameter passing paper describes five parameter semantics categories (in, inout, out, move, and forward) to replace C++'s parameter passing styles (value, reference, const reference, r-value reference, and forwarding reference). And it poses the question of how parameter passing semantics can reasonably be made visible at the call-site.
-
Does Rust have any design mistakes?
Another design mistake, imho, is that Rust does not have Herb Sutter’s parameter passing style from his 708 paper. For example, out parameters instantly remove almost all use-cases for MaybeUninit, adding strong compiler guarantees and requiring zero unsafe code.
-
Is C++ Doomed?
In my C++ code, I've copied Rust and expressed fallible initialization by returning a std::optional from a static method (which the article failed to mention). The problem is that (like Rust) you lose placement initialization, and (unlike C++ or Rust) you can't initialize private fields using aggregate initialization or initializer lists, and must write a passthrough constructor (which can't even be private because it breaks make_unique).
https://github.com/hsutter/708 is a C++ proposal which unifies placement constructors and writable out-parameters ("definite first use"). I don't think it makes placement initialization fallible, but I'm not sure.
-
const all the things?
As noted elsewhere - we need in/out/forward.
- Three reasons to pass std::string_view by value
-
Last reference as rvalue?
There is a proposal by Herb Sutter (708: Parameter passing -> guaranteed unified initialization and unified value-setting) that want to do just that.
-
Experience C++ developers: do you enjoy using C++ (even for personal/hobby projects?)
Having said this, I can't wait for the dream to become reality
-
Is pass-by-value slower than pass-by-rvalue-reference?
I am waiting for this to become reality, and C++ language to suddenly lose 98% of its annoyingness!
-
All C++20 core language features with examples
Oh! That would be so nice. I mean, there is a proposal in the works, but I really doubt it will be adopted as it is.
- Proposal idea : attribute to force value assignment to default-constructible member in constructor
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 1 May 2024
Stats
Basic 708 repo stats
12
80
1.8
over 2 years ago
hsutter/708 is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of 708 is C++.
Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com