Performance comparison: Reduct Storage vs. Minio

• reduct-py

  9 3 8.0 Python

  Discontinued ReductStore Client SDK for Python [Moved to: https://github.com/reductstore/reduct-py] (by reduct-storage)

  

  Reduct Storage Client SDK for Python

• CodeRabbit

  coderabbit.ai featured

  CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

  

• reduct-vs-minio

  1 0 3.9 Python

  Benchmarks for write/read blob int minio and reduct-storage

  

  Full Example on GitHub

• Reduct Storage

  24 16 8.9 C++

  Discontinued A time series database for storing and managing large amounts of blob data [Moved to: https://github.com/reductstore/reductstore]

  

  As you can see, Reduct Storage is always faster for write operations (16 times for 10 Mb blobs!!!) and a bit slower for reading when we have many small objects. You may notice that the speed decreasing for both databases when we reduce the size of chunks. This can be explained with HTTP overhead because we spend a dedicated HTTP request for each write or read operation.

Suggest a related project