Performance comparison: Reduct Storage vs. Minio

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on dev.to

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
  • reduct-py

    Discontinued ReductStore Client SDK for Python [Moved to: https://github.com/reductstore/reduct-py] (by reduct-storage)

  • Reduct Storage Client SDK for Python

  • reduct-vs-minio

    Benchmarks for write/read blob int minio and reduct-storage

  • Full Example on GitHub

  • InfluxDB

    Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

    InfluxDB logo
  • Reduct Storage

    Discontinued A time series database for storing and managing large amounts of blob data [Moved to: https://github.com/reductstore/reductstore]

  • As you can see, Reduct Storage is always faster for write operations (16 times for 10 Mb blobs!!!) and a bit slower for reading when we have many small objects. You may notice that the speed decreasing for both databases when we reduce the size of chunks. This can be explained with HTTP overhead because we spend a dedicated HTTP request for each write or read operation.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts