-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
If you have a crappy connection, you should really use mosh (https://mosh.org/) instead of SSH.
My own experience is that text user interfaces over mosh work far better than web applications when on a crappy connection.
My experience isn't specifically with textualized-based applications though (one is irssi, the terminal IRC client, and some with proprietary applications from $work).
-
I'm actually working on this. Component based over the wire TUI system. It's in a decent alpha state but I want to code and host some more sample sites before I start sharing a ton.
Protocol: https://github.com/rendicott/uggly
Client with gif demo: https://github.com/rendicott/uggly-client
-
I'm actually working on this. Component based over the wire TUI system. It's in a decent alpha state but I want to code and host some more sample sites before I start sharing a ton.
Protocol: https://github.com/rendicott/uggly
Client with gif demo: https://github.com/rendicott/uggly-client
-
textual
Lean TUI application framework for Python. Build sophisticated terminal user interfaces with a simple Python API. Run your apps in the terminal and a web browser.
-
We simply have a different perspective on this. You see a TUI and have experience in the "Bronze Age" of the Internet in which browsers were not so stable across platforms/etc. and think that this more or less just doesn't work. I suspect peoples' experiences using it for a while now won't sway you; you are more than welcome to assume everything works only on one computer and is reliably broken elsewhere. I don't care what you choose to build your company with but I personally find this attitude towards new tools toxic and paralyzing. Hence my attempt at engaging to learn more.
From my perspective, I've used Rich in one of the very few contexts that practically matter (a terminal on macOS) and had a good experience. Will M. has been developing it in the open for a couple of years now and it's nearing critical mass in some parts of the Python ecosystem. If it was a diaper turned into a Molotov cocktail, it simply wouldn't the adoption it has so far. It probably runs fine on the three major operating systems of today, which is pretty much what a TUI needs to do. I have no idea if it runs smoothly on a Commodore 64 and to be honest I don't really care.
> Perhaps you'll be able to point me to what I missed.
You could have a look at Rich itself, which is what Textualize uses: https://github.com/Textualize/rich. I don't build UIs but the number of files/LOC gives me a bit more confidence that my personal experience wasn't a fluke.
> If this were a pure open source project,
What's a "pure" open source project in your view? You can review the licenses of the projects yourself and determine if MIT is "pure" open source, or see what the company says about their plans with the project: https://www.textualize.io/what-we-do
> Rich, Textual, and many of our future projects will continue to be built in public, with an Open-source license.
-
Related posts
-
Ask HN: Programmers and Technologists in Scotland
-
Is anyone still making text user interfaces for end users?
-
Chatting with Will McGugan: From Side Project To Startup
-
Rich, Textual, and Rich-CLI have a new website
-
文本化 - 构建文本用户界面应用程序的框架 (Textualize – A framework for building Text User Interface applications)