Ruby vs. Python comes down to the for loop

This page summarizes the projects mentioned and recommended in the original post on

Our great sponsors
  • SonarQube - Static code analysis for 29 languages.
  • - Download’s Tech Salary Report
  • Scout APM - Less time debugging, more time building
  • pushgen

    For me, its the explicitness in Python that is killer. I can see a name and match that to an import and match that to a package. Grabbing a function pointer works exactly as I would expect.

    Stealing from Krister Stendahl's laws for religious discourse, Ruby's composable iteration is one area I have holy envy, particularly after I got used to it in Rust. I've used Python's generators many times just to have to switch to an explicit for loop. Things are generally better with a composable iteration model but occasionally I find myself switching to loops in Rust.

    Unlike Ruby, Rust does pull-iteration, like Python, though there are experiments with Ruby-style push-iteration [0] [1].



  • FoxDot

    Python driven environment for Live Coding

    Not sure how they compare feature-wise, but take a look at FoxDot:

  • SonarQube

    Static code analysis for 29 languages.. Your projects are multi-language. So is SonarQube analysis. Find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells so you can release quality code every time. Get started analyzing your projects today for free.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.

Suggest a related project

Related posts