-
SurveyJS
Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App. With SurveyJS form UI libraries, you can build and style forms in a fully-integrated drag & drop form builder, render them in your JS app, and store form submission data in any backend, inc. PHP, ASP.NET Core, and Node.js.
-
stealth-vendor
Discontinued :package: Stealth Vendor Profile dependencies (containing IP, ASN, whois, CNAME and PTR data)
Actually, it's not that many that have documentation available. /s
But, given that Donuts Inc are the overlord of the internet in terms of (g)TLDs, there's not as many as some might think.
The native whois client on most distributions is on github and contains a self-maintained list of whois servers in case you're curious [1].
It also contains a list of all new gTLDs [2], which, for the most part are registered via Donuts Inc. in the end. It's kinda ridiculous that something like ".berlin" is owned, hosted, and distributed by an American company in Texas.
The ICANNWiki also has some nice side-facts about registrars if you're more curious about their organizational structure [3].
[1] https://github.com/rfc1036/whois/blob/next/tld_serv_list
[2] https://github.com/rfc1036/whois/blob/next/new_gtlds_list
[3] https://icannwiki.org/Donuts
I'm building a peer to peer Browser network that relies on trust ratios/factor in order to find out the seed/leech ratio of sharing content, producing content etc.
The problem I'm currently trying to solve is that I had the idea to have a vendor profile that contains the necessary information for IP ranges (ASN, organization, region, country, ISP/NAT etc) so that the discovery service for that doesn't have to do this.
It's like the basic idea of an offline "map of the internet" that should be an approximation of who does what in which amount of data (e.g. data center IPs aren't trustworthy or same ISP-NATed IP could be censored the same when it comes to blocked websites etc).
At this point it's a big experiment and I'm not sure whether I'm fundamentally wrong about this as I don't have any data to back it up.
If you're curious, it's part of the Stealth Browser I'm building [1] and [2]
[1] https://github.com/tholian-network/stealth
[2] https://github.com/tholian-network/stealth-vendor
I'm building a peer to peer Browser network that relies on trust ratios/factor in order to find out the seed/leech ratio of sharing content, producing content etc.
The problem I'm currently trying to solve is that I had the idea to have a vendor profile that contains the necessary information for IP ranges (ASN, organization, region, country, ISP/NAT etc) so that the discovery service for that doesn't have to do this.
It's like the basic idea of an offline "map of the internet" that should be an approximation of who does what in which amount of data (e.g. data center IPs aren't trustworthy or same ISP-NATed IP could be censored the same when it comes to blocked websites etc).
At this point it's a big experiment and I'm not sure whether I'm fundamentally wrong about this as I don't have any data to back it up.
If you're curious, it's part of the Stealth Browser I'm building [1] and [2]
[1] https://github.com/tholian-network/stealth
[2] https://github.com/tholian-network/stealth-vendor
Related posts
-
The FBI Identified a Tor User
-
There are no Internet Browsers that cannot be tracked, or are there?
-
Ask HN: How you would redesign a web browser?
-
TholianĀ® Stealth - Secure, Peer-to-Peer, Private and Automatable Web Browser/Scraper/Proxy for the Web of Truth and Knowledge. Goals: increased Privacy, increased Automation, adaptive Semantic Understanding. Web Scraper + Web Service + Web Proxy
-
Request for Feedback on Network Concept