Our great sponsors
-
ffi-overhead
comparing the c ffi (foreign function interface) overhead on various programming languages
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
By comparison, PyO3 handles virtually all that boilerplate, so your Rust functions can accept and return many native Rust types and everything just works (for example). Or maybe I'm missing some fundamental difference with how JVM data are handled versus Python.
In Java 7 and 8, at least, it's not great, but it's not horrible either - based on the comparison here, anyway: https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a more popular project.
Related posts
- Calling native Rust code from PowerShell
- Interop your .NET application with Rust
- Are there any .NET interop crates? I would like to use C# as GUI frontend for editor in my game
- Using io_uring from Python by JITing C code for writing high performance servers
- Using io_uring from Python by JITing C code for writing high performance servers with MetaCall