Candidate Boost.Mustache review starts today

1. mustache.js

   1 52 16,610 0.0 JavaScript

   Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript

   

   This is one of the least-bad names because it implements a non-Boost standard and it's named after that. I've used mustache in Python so knew immediately it was a templating language.

2. CodeRabbit

   coderabbit.ai featured

   CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

   

3. spec

   2 3 390 4.9 YAML

   The Mustache spec. (by mustache)

   

   I haven't fuzzed the library. I used the official test suite from https://github.com/mustache/spec.

4. mustache

   3 1 10 10.0 C++

   Boost.Mustache (by pdimov)

   

   Repository

5. bustache

   4 1 84 2.0 C++

   C++20 implementation of {{ mustache }}

   

   Additionally, why would I care about this specific library implementation, when there are others like bustache which are a lot more popular (0 stars vs 63) and which have much more features, like the optional parts of the Mustache spec? The star count seems petty, but I guess that a library with 0 stars has not been out there for long and had actual real world usage.

6. boostache

   5 2 92 10.0 C++

   Template engine library in C++

   

   This project is what I was referring to as Boostache.

7. mstch

   6 4 573 0.0 C++

   mstch is a complete implementation of {{mustache}} templates using modern C++

   

   How does this compare to https://github.com/no1msd/mstch ? I see they both rely on c++11 and mstch is compliant with the lambda module . If this is the same P. Dimov who wrote the “simple c++11 meta programming” series of articles I can’t wait to check the code. On the other hand I appreciate the simplicity of mstch.

Suggest a related project