zsh_unplugged VS sheldon

I even developed my own take on micro plugin managers at one point, zsh_unplugged. What's Zap's claim to fame?

If you want to build your own, I also offer zsh_unplugged

I found a DIY zsh plugin manager.

If you want to have control over everything as much as possible, you can use sheldon/antibody or https://github.com/mattmc3/zsh_unplugged, then pick and choose zsh plugins you want to use

After antibody was deprecated last winter and the recent zinit debacle, I got to thinking - why do I even need a Zsh plugin manager? Thus, I have created zsh_unplugged to show you how you can clone and source Zsh plugins lightning fast with one simple Zsh function.

I prefer sheldon[1] for the few plugins I use

[1] https://github.com/rossmacarthur/sheldon

Personally, I prefer https://github.com/rossmacarthur/sheldon. It's simple yet flexible, fast and shell agnostic.

Yes! rossmacarthur/sheldon is easy to use.

I’ve switched away from using OMZ as an all-in-one framework that takes over my .zshrc, but I still use some of its plugins. Its plugin management is too slow for my tastes, but there’s a few plugins that I came to rely on.

Switching to Sheldon [0] has given me the best of both worlds.

[0] https://github.com/rossmacarthur/sheldon

I noticed that sheldon is missing from those benchmarks. Does it not qualify as a "zsh framework"?

I’ve been using sheldon for the past few months and been pretty happy with it. It seems plenty fast enough and the most obscure the verbiage gets is the toml config file.