zfs-localpv VS traefik

I use it in Kubernetes via https://github.com/openebs/zfs-localpv

The PersistentVolume API is a nice way to divvy up a shared resource across different teams, and using ZFS for that gives us the snapshotting, deduplication, and compression for free. For our workloads, it benchmarked faster than XFS so it was a no-brainer.

Last few months I experimented more and more with all OpenEBS solutions that fit small Kubernetes cluster, using MicroK8S and Hetzner Cloud for a real experience.

I would investigate https://openebs.io/ https://portworx.com/ https://longhorn.io/ if you are forced to you can mount ISCSI on the kublet and feed it to one of those solutions. Keep in mind most of the big guys buy some sort of managed solution that you can point a CSI like trident https://netapp-trident.readthedocs.io

What are some cool projects to self hosted on a home Raspberry Pi (64 bit) Kubernetes cluster (Helm charts). arm64 support is a must. A lot of projects only build amd64 Docker containers which don't run on my cluster.

I currently run:

   - obenebs (provides abstraction for using local k8s worker disks as PVC mounts when running on-prem) -- https://openebs.io/

I didn't set anything actually -- I need to look into whether OpenEBS ZFS LocalPV can facilitate passing ZVOL options (I don't think it can just yet). The only tuning I did on the storage class was the usual ZFS-level options.

What do you use to provision Kubernetes persistent volumes on bare metal? I’m looking at open-ebs (https://openebs.io/).

Also, when you bump the image tag in a git commit for a given helm chart, how does that get deployed? Is it automatic, or do you manually run helm upgrade commands?

ListItem( 'Kubernetes', 'https://kubernetes.io/', 'Container Engines and Orchestration', """Kubernetes is an open-source container-orchestration system for automating computer application deployment, scaling, and management.""" ), ListItem( 'Podman', 'https://podman.io/', 'Container Engines and Orchestration', """Podman is a daemonless, open source, Linux native tool designed to make it easy to find, run, build, share and deploy applications using Open Containers Initiative (OCI) Containers and Container Images.""" ), # Data Storage :: Block Storage ListItem( 'Amazon EBS', 'https://aws.amazon.com/ebs/', 'Data Storage :: Block Storage', """Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) is an easy-to-use, scalable, high-performance block-storage service designed for Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2).""" ), ListItem( 'OpenEBS', 'https://openebs.io/', 'Data Storage :: Block Storage', """OpenESB is a Java-based open-source enterprise service bus. It allows you to integrate legacy systems, external and internal partners and new development in your Business Process.""" ), # Data Storage :: Cluster Storage ListItem( 'Ceph', 'https://ceph.io/en/', 'Data Storage :: Cluster Storage', """Ceph is an open-source software storage platform, implements object storage on a single distributed computer cluster, and provides 3-in-1 interfaces for object-, block- and file-level storage.""" ), ListItem( 'Hadoop Distributed File System', 'https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r1.2.1/hdfs_design.html', 'Data Storage :: Cluster Storage', """The Hadoop Distributed File System ( HDFS ) is a distributed file system designed to run on commodity hardware.""" ), # Data Storage :: Object Storage ListItem( 'Amazon S3', 'https://aws.amazon.com/s3/', 'Data Storage :: Object Storage', """Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services that provides scalable object storage through a web service interface.""" )

Ideas from my kubernetes experience: * Cert-Manager is very popular and almost a must-have if you terminate SSL inside the cluster * Backups using velero * A dashboard/UI is actually very helpful to quickly browse resources, client tools like k9s are fine too * Secret: Management: Bitnami Sealed Secrets is the second big project in that space * I would add Loki to aggregate Logs * Never heard of ory. Usually I see (dex)[https://dexidp.io/] or keycloak used for Authentication * I like to run OpenEBS as in-cluster storage. * Istio isn't compatible with the upcomming ServiceMeshInterface (i think), so the trend seem to go toward Linkerd * Some Operator to deploy your favorite Database, is also a nice learning exercise.

However, it's very unlikely that .NET developers will directly expose their Kestrel-based web apps to the internet. Typically, we use other popular web servers like Nginx, Traefik, and Caddy to act as a reverse-proxy in front of Kestrel for various reasons:

Not as good though. Case in point: https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues/5472#issuecomment-... (that's just from this morning)

I'm speak objectively here. Of course, any built-in auto HTTPS that works (more or less) is better than none. Traefik uses an ACME library that was originally written for Caddy. After the original author left that project, Traefik team started maintaining it. Caddy's users' requirements exceeded what the library was capable of, but unfortunately there was friction in getting it to achieve our requirements. So I ended up writing a new ACME client library in Go and, together with upgrades in CertMagic (Caddy's auto-TLS lib), Caddy has the more flexible, robust, and capable auto-HTTPS functionality.

That is to say, not all auto-HTTPS functionalities are the same.

We'll use Traefik, an open source cloud native gateway that can plug into a Kubernetes cluster. It has the concept of "middleware" that can process API requests before passing them through to a backend. We can configuring a rate limit for all of our API endpoints by matching on the request path:

I did the same question here and here

Sadly there is currently no way of doing so. https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues/6999

Traefik is another widely used system that has automatic configuration and offers support for more things like swarm/kubernetes/etc.

I have a webapp which I currently have deployed by running nginx in a container. Works as it should, however I am intersted in adding more observability to the webapp and found this reverse-proxy https://github.com/traefik/traefik which seems to expose some nice metrics which can be useful for observability.

``` more details in this (github issue)[https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues/5059]