fast-syntax-highlighting
autocomplete
fast-syntax-highlighting | autocomplete | |
---|---|---|
13 | 164 | |
998 | 24,302 | |
5.5% | 0.2% | |
3.2 | 9.6 | |
6 months ago | 8 days ago | |
Shell | TypeScript | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
fast-syntax-highlighting
-
Melhorando e configurando seu novo Shell linux. Pt-2
git clone https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-autosuggestions.git $ZSH_CUSTOM/plugins/zsh-autosuggestions && git clone https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting.git $ZSH_CUSTOM/plugins/zsh-syntax-highlighting && git clone https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlighting.git ${ZSH_CUSTOM:-$HOME/.oh-my-zsh/custom}/plugins/fast-syntax-highlighting && git clone --depth 1 -- https://github.com/marlonrichert/zsh-autocomplete.git $ZSH_CUSTOM/plugins/zsh-autocomplete
-
fish-shell: the user-friendly command-line shell
Am i the only one who feels fish is not worth it despite of hype? Don't get me wrong. I think that fish is really good shell.
BUT...
After adding the following plugins to zsh(before you chime in, it's just adding these lines,not anything configuring much. also it auto bootstraps on new install), I found out that fish is no where near configured zsh.
1) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/zinit (plugin manager)
2) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlightin...
3) https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/history-search-multi-wo...
4) https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-autosuggestions
5) https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-completions
6) https://github.com/Aloxaf/fzf-tab
7) any good shell prompt generator like https://github.com/romkatv/powerlevel10k
For example, I use fzf integration for tab completion. Fish's fzf integration is nowhere as good as that of zsh's. Also, posix compat and almost bash compat of zsh is plus.
I acknowledge that zsh isn't perfect shell either and I have tried and failed few times in past to switch to fish. If you provide me compelling reason/s to switch to fish, I am all ears.
-
The features of the Fish shell, but POSIX compliant?
Which modules are you using for zsh? I've migrated to https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlighting and it seems faster than previous one. For autocompletion, I know there is a plugin, but I've switched to fzf's ability to search in history and I don't need it anymore.
- A new fzf-like solution for grepping and opening files
-
Brew for plugins or clone the repo manually...
# https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlighting zinit ice depth"1"; zinit light zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlighting
-
ZSH autocompletion or autosuggestion? And what's syntax highlighting?
ZSH Fast Syntax Highlighting
-
Only me?
If you're on zsh, you may enjoy fast-syntax-highlighting
-
Is this safe to use?
I recently downloaded this syntax highlighter: https://github.com/z-shell/F-Sy-H. This was before I found this one: https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlighting. Could anyone tell me if I need to check my computer for malware? It's just that I'm not sure if it's safe.
-
Choosing ZSH framework
If you decide to piece together your own configuration, things to look for are a prompt (aka "theme") (that's that Starship, suggested in another comment, is), autocompletion, and syntax highlighting. To give you a head start, zsh-users/zsh-autosuggestions is a widely used autosuggestions plugin, and zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting and zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlighting are two widely used syntax highlighters (you'd only use one of the two).
-
Why Bash prompt is not colored in Kitty terminal?
Do you have any plugins in zsh? That looks like a syntax highlighting plugin like this: https://github.com/zdharma-continuum/fast-syntax-highlighting
autocomplete
-
Fig Is Sunsetting
Having contributed to the Fig autocomplete specs, I find this sad. The Amazon product Fig was built into basically works as replacement, which is good. Still, the core value of this product are the open-source autocomplete specs: https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete. What's going to happen to that? It looks like they are still using it in the Amazon product. It should definitely be possible for an open-source re-implementation of the Fig UI to use those specs. There is a lot of knowledge encoded in there!
-
Top Free Utility Mac Apps You Aren’t Using
8. Fig
-
Ask HN: Alternatives to fig.io as it has signups disabled?
Fig is awesome but with signups blocked[1] for 2+mo already it's also as good as dead ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
* [1]: https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete/issues/2068
-
Show HN: Inshellisense – IDE style shell autocomplete
https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete is it this?
- Fig
-
Show HN: Whiz – A copilot for your command line
How is this different than https://fig.io/?
-
Boost DX, Enhance UX, and Skyrocket Profits! Dive into a sub-50ms world with Edge Feature Flags 🚀
AWS CloudWatch Evidently The worst. No comment. AWS seems to perpetually lack a good DX for developers. It appears that they don't recognize or continually undervalue the importance of roles other than engineers, such as Product Managers or Designers. Very disappointing. However, AWS has recently acquired Fig, so looks like they're now pursuing an acquisition strategy instead. Let's see how it turns it out, and let's hope they don't ruin Fig, since it's such an useful tool.
-
Ask HN: What are some well-designed websites?
slightly tangential, but where do people get awesome landing pages like linear(https://fig.io/. has similar landing page) etc. Do they build them in-house or buy templates somewhere? Many of the recently launched YC companies have awesome landing pages. eg. https://automorphic.ai/,
-
Fig Has Joined AWS
I love this product, have contributed several times to it, and I'm a little torn. One thing I am thinking about now, is that the completion specs are MIT-licensed, and it should be possible to use them to re-implement a basic open-source version of the autocompletion product... https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete
What are some alternatives?
zsh4humans - A turnkey configuration for Zsh
ohmyzsh - 🙃 A delightful community-driven (with 2,300+ contributors) framework for managing your zsh configuration. Includes 300+ optional plugins (rails, git, macOS, hub, docker, homebrew, node, php, python, etc), 140+ themes to spice up your morning, and an auto-update tool so that makes it easy to keep up with the latest updates from the community.
Warp - Warp is a modern, Rust-based terminal with AI built in so you and your team can build great software, faster.
fzf-tab - Replace zsh's default completion selection menu with fzf!
fast-syntax-highlightin
zsh-vi-mode - 💻 A better and friendly vi(vim) mode plugin for ZSH.
starship - ☄🌌️ The minimal, blazing-fast, and infinitely customizable prompt for any shell!
Shuttle - Shuttle Music Player
hyperterm - A terminal built on web technologies
FairEmail - Fully featured, open source, privacy friendly email app for Android
zsh-autocomplete - 🤖 Real-time type-ahead completion for Zsh. Asynchronous find-as-you-type autocompletion.