yjs
parcel
yjs | parcel | |
---|---|---|
53 | 171 | |
15,350 | 43,156 | |
3.9% | 0.2% | |
8.6 | 9.4 | |
5 days ago | 5 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
MIT | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
yjs
- Show HN: Collaborate on your YC Application with CRDT-powered forms
-
Making CRDTs 98% More Efficient
One idea is just to use fewer random bits in peerIDs. Yjs (https://docs.yjs.dev/) gets away with just 32 random bits. If you compromise and use 64 random bits, then even a very popular doc with 1 million lifetime peerIDs will have a < 10^-7 lifetime probability of collision.
-
An Interactive Intro to CRDTs
I've seen it come up often in collaborative text editors.
Also see: https://github.com/yjs/yjs
-
JSON Schema Store
You are absolutely right that XML is better for document structures.
My current theory is that Yjs [0] is the new JSON+XML. It gives you both JSON and XML types in one nested structure, all with conflict free merging via incremental updates.
Also, you note the issue with XML and overlapping inline markup. Yjs has an answer for that with its text type, you can apply attributes (for styling or anything else) via arbatary ranges. They can overlap.
Obviously I'm being a little hypabolic suggesting it will replace JSON, the beauty of JSON is is simplicity, but for many systems building on Yjs or similar CRDT based serialisation systems is the future.
https://github.com/yjs/yjs/
-
Launch HN: Tiptap (YC S23) โ Toolkit for developing collaborative editors
Note: https://github.com/yjs/yjs for collaborative "document edition, and user cursors"; has WebRTC, web socket, matrix.org backend
-
Wormholers, what can CCP and wormholers do to improve J-Space?
CCP needs to revamp proto anyway, due to recent exploits... practically, nothing really prevents 'em from using some sort of CRDT's to make the state of the sig view eventually consistent (yjs lib, if we're speaking frontendian).
-
How to use Yjs with Ruby on Rails?
Yjs framework: Because it is a CRDT implementation which provides collaborative editing and offline-first capability.
-
๐๐๐ EweserDB, the user-owned database ๐๐๐
No problem. The database CRUD features are just helpers as an abstraction on top of yjs: https://docs.yjs.dev/. Eweser adds schemas in the form of typescript types to make using it simpler, more structured, and interoperability easier.
- Ask HN: What is new in Algorithms / Data Structures these days?
- How does Google docs send the changes done by other users in real-time?
parcel
-
How and why do we bundle zx?
At first we wanted to just get rid of all the helper utilities. Keep only the kernel, but this would mean a loss of backward compatibility. We needed some efficient code processing instead with recomposition and tree-shaking. We needed a bundler. But which one? Our testing approach relies on targets, not sources. We rebuilt the project frequently, speed was critical requirement. In essence, we chose a solution from a couple of among all available alternatives: esbuild and parcel. Esbuild won. Specifically in our case, it proved to be more productive and customizable.
-
DEMO - Voice to PDF - Complete PDF documents with voice commands using the Claude 3 Opus API
It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:
-
Getting started with TiniJS framework
Homepage: https://parceljs.org/
-
React Server Components Example with Next.js
In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldnโt find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I canโt say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs.
-
JS Toolbox 2024: Bundlers and Test Frameworks
Parcel 2 emphasizes a zero-configuration approach to bundling web applications. It's a powerful tool that offers a hassle-free developer experience, focusing on simplicity and speed.
-
Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them. Bun is vying for the spot of The New Hotness in bundling, Rome has been forked into Biome, and Vercel is building a Rust-based Webpack alternative.
-
What is JSDoc and why you may not need typescript for your next project?
Parcel
-
Building Node.js applications without dependencies
Iโve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser.
Here's what I have found so far:
- JavaScript (vanilla) is a viable alternative to React.js
-
11 Ways to Optimize Yourย Website
Besides Webpack, there are many other popular web bundlers available, such as Parcel, Esbuild, Rollup, and more. They all have their own unique features and strengths, and you should make your decision based on the needs and requirements of your specific project. Please refer to their official websites for details.
-
Bun vs Node.js: Everything you need to know
In the Node.js ecosystem, bundling is typically handled by third-party tools rather than Node.js itself. Some of the most popular bundlers in the Node.js world include Webpack, Rollup, and Parcel, offering features like code splitting, tree shaking, and hot module replacement.
What are some alternatives?
automerge - A JSON-like data structure (a CRDT) that can be modified concurrently by different users, and merged again automatically.
vite - Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!
liveblocks - Liveblocks is a platform to ship collaborative features like comments, notifications, text editors in minutes instead of months.
gulp - A toolkit to automate & enhance your workflow
automerge-rs - Rust implementation of automerge [Moved to: https://github.com/automerge/automerge]
esbuild - An extremely fast bundler for the web
crdt-woot - Implementation of collaborative editing algorithm CRDT WOOT.
Next.js - The React Framework
milkdown - ๐ผ Plugin driven WYSIWYG markdown editor framework.
webpack - A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows for loading parts of the application on demand. Through "loaders", modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
MobX - Simple, scalable state management.
Rollup - Next-generation ES module bundler