yearn-pm VS staking-launchpad

I do their transparency, makes my job easier: https://github.com/yearn/yearn-pm/blob/master/financials/reports/2021Q2-yearn-quarterly-report.pdf

Yearn even publishes earnings reports like a public company: https://github.com/yearn/yearn-pm

This is a pretty good primer of stuff. It links to several websites with data updated daily.

Decentralized finance yield aggregator Yearn published its first quarterly report for the current year on the GitHub service on April 27. The protocol's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) were $4,88 million for the first three months of 2021.

which makes users stick to the ones that actually generate revenue. 2 examples: Sushi and YFI, started only a few months ago, already make significant tx fee revenue (10-15 p/e). https://github.com/iearn-finance/yearn-pm/blob/master/financials/reports/2020Q3-yearn-quarterly-report.pdf All that money otherwise spent on mindless operative / administrative costs now go back to users.

I created an issue with on the github for staking launchpad (https://github.com/ethereum/staking-launchpad/issues/646). I hope they will start suggesting something like this for everyone, just to be safe.

Almost there to get integrated into the Staking Launchpad also! https://github.com/ethereum/staking-launchpad/pull/541

lodestar-nethermind for maximum client diversity impact. Unfortunately, when it comes to "historical reliability", on the execution layer, nothing has even been around long enough to have the track record of geth, and on the consensus layer, lodestar hasn't been mainnet ready as long as the others, and there's still a pending pull request to add lodestar to the client list on the launchpad.

The official Ethereum 2.0 deposit launchpad gets open-sourced.

I submitted this as issue 315 on the launchpad github.