xmltodict VS plumbum

Your Cloud Function would be written in Node.js, Python, Go, Java, C#, Ruby, or PHP; pick the one you're most comfortable with. It would get the name and bucket of the newly uploaded XML file as an input parameter. It would then load the file and call a library that makes the conversion. Example libraries: xml-js (for Node), xmltodict (for Python).

Go with xmltodict. Works pretty fine, and you just have to drop any key begining with @ or # (if there is not already an option for that).

Nope, sorry, it's just an XML generator. The Python stdlib offers https://docs.python.org/3/library/xml.etree.elementtree.html and PyPI offers https://github.com/martinblech/xmltodict for parsing, and you could write CSV with csvwriter or pandas.

xmlstarlet is really nothing like jq, as a language. But yes, I use it because it is the best commandline xml processor I'd found. That's the only similarity to jq.

Is this the yq? https://kislyuk.github.io/yq/ It does contain an 'xq', as a literal wrapper for jq, piping output into it after transcoding XML to JSON using xmltodict https://github.com/martinblech/xmltodict (which explodes xml into separate JSON data structures).

This is a bash one-liner! But TBF it really is a 'jq for xml'. I think it would be horrible for some things, but you could also do a lot of useful things painlessly.

Super-easy, take a look at xmltodict https://github.com/martinblech/xmltodict xmltodict.parse(xml_str) gets you a dictionary

if you liked that, you'll love Plumbum[1] :)

[1] https://github.com/tomerfiliba/plumbum

plumbum

I wonder if you included plumbum in your comparison. For some reason, my long time favorite module for this (and more) always gets overlooked.

You'll still have to juggle the input, but when using Python, plumbum offers a solid function for this: choose

It's kinda a nice thing. And the few people that need something like this are already using https://xon.sh/ or https://plumbum.readthedocs.io/ or https://ipython.org/ . You can have a look at these projects though. See what works and doesn't to guide the goals of your own project.