wsl-vpnkit
nushell
Our great sponsors
wsl-vpnkit | nushell | |
---|---|---|
18 | 212 | |
2,070 | 29,963 | |
- | 2.8% | |
2.5 | 9.9 | |
5 months ago | 2 days ago | |
Shell | Rust | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
wsl-vpnkit
-
Windows Subsystem for Linux gets new 'mirrored' network mode
Mirrored network mode sounds quite a lot like what wsl-vpnkit does: https://github.com/sakai135/wsl-vpnkit
This came from Docker Desktop for Windows, where they needed a solution for VPNs like GlobalProtect and AnyConnect that are often configured to drop packets for networks that aren't the main one associated with the VPN.
-
Windows Subsystem for Linux 2.0 release
I'm going to wait a while to see how the new VPN stuff works out. Previously WSL2 didn't work with a Windows VPN without an extra tool ( https://github.com/sakai135/wsl-vpnkit ), hopefully this might fix things, but not going to risk trying it in case it breaks everything.
-
Simple PowerShell things allowing you to dig a bit deeper than usual
https://github.com/sakai135/wsl-vpnkit fixes that problem for me, and is less annoying than other fixes I tried
-
Can't use Warp Zero Trust on WSL 2
So i installed warp on windows and try to run go mod init to access few packages from my org private repo, and it says the repo not found, So i search and found that WSL 2 need this for Zero Trust to run on WSL 2 : https://github.com/sakai135/wsl-vpnkit , I've download and started the service but it still can't access the repo, does anyone has this problem when developing go with zero trust ?
-
Search domains
There's also a reference to https://github.com/sakai135/wsl-vpnkit, which looks like a much more ambitious effort to deal with this.
-
Make WSA (Windows Subsystem for Android) Run on Windows 10
If it works at all like WSL, you might want to look at wsl-vpnkit.
https://github.com/sakai135/wsl-vpnkit
It's not a proxy, but would give some idea how to shim into the middle.
-
Duality of man
there's a fix for that! https://github.com/sakai135/wsl-vpnkit
-
Unable to connect the internet in corporate office network
Have you tried wsl-vpnkit?
- Wsl-vpnkit: Provides network connectivity to WSL 2 when blocked by VPN
- Who else is forced to use Windows and how do you work around it?
nushell
-
NuShell - Ceci n'est pas une |
These are just three small examples of what this shell written in Rust allows. The features are many and many more, but I'll leave it up to you to discover and enjoy them; I'm currently playing around with it and it's giving me a lot of satisfaction and immediacy, now it has a fixed place among the tools I use when working! The project is Open Source, so if you want to contribute, I invite you, as always, to do so, I leave you the link to the repo here!
- Xonsh: Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell
-
Fish shell 3.7.0: last release branch before the full Rust rewrite
Any thoughts on fish as compared to nushell [0]? It's similar to PowerShell in its philosophy and is also written in Rust.
[0] https://github.com/nushell/nushell
-
jc: Converts the output of popular command-line tools to JSON
> In PowerShell, structured output is the default and it seems to work very well.
PowerShell goes a step beyond JSON, by supporting actual mutable objects. So instead of just passing through structured data, you effectively pass around opaque objects that allow you to go back to earlier pipeline stages, and invoke methods, if I understand correctly: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsof....
I'm rather fond of wrappers like jc and libxo, and experimental shells like https://www.nushell.sh/. These still focus on passing data, not objects with executable methods. On some level, I find this comfortable: Structured data still feels pretty Unix-like, if that makes sense? If I want actual objects, then it's probably time to fire up Python or Ruby.
Knowing when to switch from a shell script to a full-fledged programming language is important, even if your shell is basically awesome and has good programming features.
-
Ripgrep is faster than {grep, ag, Git grep, ucg, pt, sift}
Maybe if the "popular" shells, but http://www.nushell.sh/ is looking better and better
- "<ESC>[31M"? ANSI Terminal security in 2023 and finding 10 CVEs
-
jq 1.7 Released
Yeah agreed, especially now that PowerShell is available cross-platform.
Nushell[1] also seems like a promising alternative, but I haven’t had a chance to play with it yet.
[1]: https://www.nushell.sh/
-
The Case for Nushell
I also discovered an existing discussion[1] related to this topic which includes a link[2] to a "helper to call nushell nuon/json/yaml commands from bash/fish/zsh" and a comment[3] that the current nushell dev focus is "on getting the experience inside nushell right and [we] probably won't be able to dedicate design time to get the interface of native Nu commands with an outside POSIX shell right and stable.".
[0] https://gitlab.com/RancidBacon/notes_public/-/blob/main/note...
[1] "Expose some commands to external world #6554": https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6554
[2] https://github.com/cruel-intentions/devshell-files/blob/mast...
[3] https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/6554#issuecomment-...
I appreciate what projects like Nushell and Murex are trying to address, but having a saner scripting language and passing structured data in pipelines is not worth the drawbacks for me.
For one, Bash scripting is not so bad if you set some sane defaults and use ShellCheck. Sure, it has its quirks, but all languages do. Even so, the same golden rule applies: use a "real" programming language if your problem exceeds a certain level of complexity. This is relative and will depend on your discomfort threshold, but using the right tool for the job is always a good practice. No matter how good the shell language is, I would hesitate to write and maintain a complex project in it.
And for general QoL improvements with interactive use, Zsh is a fine shell, while still being POSIX compatible.
[1]: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/blob/main/crates/nu-comma...
[2]: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/5027
[3]: https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/9310
-
Simple PowerShell things allowing you to dig a bit deeper than usual
I found nushell (https://www.nushell.sh) to be an impressive replacement "bash" for Windows
In terms of philosophy, think "Powershell but actually intuitive" : Every data is structured but command names are what you expect them to be. I usually don't even need to look at the documentation.
I liked it so much that I also replaced my shell on Linux with it, so I have the same terminal experience across all OSes
What are some alternatives?
genie - A quick way into a systemd "bottle" for WSL
fish-shell - The user-friendly command line shell.
gvisor - Application Kernel for Containers
elvish - Powerful scripting language & Versatile interactive shell
UTM - Virtual machines for iOS and macOS
starship - ☄🌌️ The minimal, blazing-fast, and infinitely customizable prompt for any shell!
runtime - Kata Containers version 1.x runtime (for version 2.x see https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers).
PowerShell - PowerShell for every system!
garden - Automation for Kubernetes development and testing. Spin up production-like environments for development, testing, and CI on demand. Use the same configuration and workflows at every step of the process. Speed up your builds and test runs via shared result caching
alacritty - A cross-platform, OpenGL terminal emulator.
PostgresApp - The easiest way to get started with PostgreSQL on the Mac
xonsh - :shell: Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell.