woo-besluit-broncode-digid-app VS rust

private static string GetPercentageRounds(double percentage) { if (percentage == 0) return "⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪"; if (percentage > 0.0 && percentage <= 0.1) return "🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪"; if (percentage > 0.1 && percentage <= 0.2) return "🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪"; if (percentage > 0.2 && percentage <= 0.3) return "🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪"; if (percentage > 0.3 && percentage <= 0.4) return "🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪"; if (percentage > 0.4 && percentage <= 0.5) return "🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪"; if (percentage > 0.5 && percentage <= 0.6) return "🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪"; if (percentage > 0.6 && percentage <= 0.7) return "🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪"; if (percentage > 0.7 && percentage <= 0.8) return "🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪"; if (percentage > 0.8 && percentage <= 0.9) return "🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪"; return "🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵"; } } } // Full source // https://github.com/MinBZK/woo-besluit-broncode-digid-app/blob/master/Source/DigiD.iOS/Services/NFCService.cs

The Dutch government was forced to release the source code of their DigiD digital authentication iOS app. It is written in C#. https://github.com/MinBZK/woo-besluit-broncode-digid-ap

I actually have a really big love hate relationship with digiD. It can be great or your biggest nightmare. I actually found a public archive of the code though: https://github.com/MinBZK/woo-besluit-broncode-digid-app

It would seem so: https://github.com/MinBZK/woo-besluit-broncode-digid-app/blo...

The interesting aspect of this is that it can be studied to write clients for platforms that are not officially supported -- currently, only Android and iOS are supported, but it'd be great to see a Linux client too.

Here's an example of someone citing a disagreement between CRT and shell32:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44650

This in addition to the Rust CVE mentioned elsewhere in the thread which was rooted in this issue:

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/04/09/cve-2024-24576.html

Here are some quick programs to test contrasting approaches. I don't have examples of inputs where they parse differently on hand right now, but I know they exist. This was also a problem that was frequently discussed internally when I worked at MSFT.

    #include 

> instead of choosing a certain numbered version of the random library (if I remember correctly) I let cargo download the latest version which had a completely different API.

Yeah, they didn't follow the instructions and got burned. I still think that multiple things went wrong simultaneously for that experience. I wonder if more prevalent uses of `#[doc(alias = "name")]` being leveraged by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120730 (which now that I check only accounts for methods and not functions, I should get on that!) so that when changing APIs around people at least get a slightly better experience.

Almost fixed the compiler: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123325

Rust: A secure, efficient, and modern programming language (omitting ten thousand words). You can simply follow the installation instructions provided on the official website.

Recently did something similar in Rust but for generating SVGs. We've adopted it for snapshot testing of cargo and rustc's output. Don't have a good PR handy for showing Github's rendering of changes in the SVG (text, side-by-side, swiping) but https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121877/files has newly added SVGs.

To see what is supported, see the screenshot in the docs: https://docs.rs/anstyle-svg/latest/anstyle_svg/

We strongly believe in Rust as a powerful language for building production-grade software, especially for systems like ours that run alongside Kubernetes.

The above Assert<{N % 2 == 1}> requires #![feature(generic_const_exprs)] and the nightly toolchain. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76560 for more info.