winepak
Flatpak-ing Microsoft Windows applications with Wine (by winepak)
flatpak-wine-runtime
Experimental Flatpak Wine runtime (by tinywrkb)
| winepak | flatpak-wine-runtime | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1 | |
| 280 | 6 | |
| 0.7% | - | |
| 10.0 | 0.0 | |
| almost 6 years ago | over 2 years ago | |
| Shell | ||
| - | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
winepak
Posts with mentions or reviews of winepak.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-29.
- How do I go about packaging niche Windows games into dedicated flatpaks?
-
Wine 8.0-rc5 released
I don't know, both flatpak-wine and winepak seems to not be adopted en-masse.
-
Flatpak 1.15.0 is released, bringing support for League of Legends (and other games that require modify_ldt to be working) emulation through Wine inside the sandbox, among other things
Theoretically, you can do either a Winepak / winepak-x86_64 or a PrismLauncher/FFXIVLauncher/a-certain-game-launcher release of LoL to give it a Flatpak release.
-
Probono, creator of AppImage, in an attempt to get AppImage support, is banned from the OBS Studio organization on GitHub after downright rude comments and accuses them of supporting Flatpak because of the bounty offered by RH. "In any event, please do not bother our project anymore"
The reason being that there is literally no point to duplicating flathub just to have your own repo, why waste computing resources. If you want to host a special build of apps that aren't on flathub, then yeah, people are hosting their own remotes. See this one, this one and this one.
-
Flatpaking Apple Airport Utility
Ehm no, that is not correct. https://github.com/winepak/winepak
flatpak-wine-runtime
Posts with mentions or reviews of flatpak-wine-runtime.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-02.
-
Flatpaking Apple Airport Utility
Wine runtime. In a modern CoW filesystem you will need probably ~10GB of storage when building this, and at least twice of that when using non-CoW fs or tmpfs.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing winepak and flatpak-wine-runtime you can also consider the following projects:
flatpaks
appimage-builder - GNU/Linux packaging solution using the AppImage format
docker-airportutility - A very strange way to give a web interface do Apple Airport Utility...
xclicker - XClicker - Fast gui autoclicker for x11 linux desktops