wg-materials VS sctp

Compare wg-materials vs sctp and see what are their differences.

wg-materials

Agenda, Minutes, Presentations (by quicwg)
ietf Quic Standards Materials working-group
Source Code
quicwg.org
Suggest alternative
Edit details

sctp

A Go implementation of SCTP (by pion)
datachannel WebRTC Networking Golang Go Sctp Pion
Source Code
pion.ly
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
wg-materials sctp
1 1
137 211
0.0% 1.4%
7.4 8.3
about 1 month ago about 1 month ago
Python Go
- MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

wg-materials

Posts with mentions or reviews of wg-materials. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-27.

sctp

Posts with mentions or reviews of sctp. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-27.
  • QUIC is now RFC 9000
    15 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 May 2021
    I am sure there are even more implementations that I am not aware of.

    * https://github.com/pion/sctp

    * https://github.com/aiortc/aiortc/blob/main/src/aiortc/rtcsct...

    * https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:thi...

    * https://github.com/sctplab/usrsctp

    People don't make these decisions for technical reasons only. Career wise it is a bad choice to spend your time working on pre-existing technologies. You don't become a distinguished engineer by iterating on existing technologies. You become one by being the creator of something new.

    I think QUIC is great and does a good job solving the problems it was designed to solve. It is disingenuous to pretend these decisions were made only for technical reasons.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing wg-materials and sctp you can also consider the following projects:

openmptcprouter - OpenMPTCProuter is an open source solution to aggregate multiple internet connections using Multipath TCP (MPTCP) on OpenWrt

http-extensions - HTTP Extensions in progress

usrsctp - A portable SCTP userland stack

http-core - Core HTTP Specifications

neqo - Neqo, an implementation of QUIC in Rust

ietf-reviewtool - Download and review IETF documents, such as Internet-Drafts or RFCs.

openssl - TLS/SSL and crypto library with QUIC APIs

shadowsocks-rust - A Rust port of shadowsocks

msquic - Cross-platform, C implementation of the IETF QUIC protocol, exposed to C, C++, C# and Rust.

wg-materials vs openmptcprouter sctp vs openmptcprouter wg-materials vs http-extensions sctp vs usrsctp wg-materials vs http-core sctp vs neqo wg-materials vs ietf-reviewtool sctp vs openssl wg-materials vs usrsctp sctp vs shadowsocks-rust wg-materials vs openssl sctp vs msquic